<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: </title>
	<atom:link href="http://idolator.com/292150/292150/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idolator.com/292150/292150</link>
	<description>Music News, Reviews, and Gossip on Idolator.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 12:37:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisb</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/292150/292150/comment-page-1#comment-252232</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 03:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://735a4a81fc10cd559478602d0c9a3bc7#comment-252232</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;
Coolfer has it wrong... or the Telegraph article changed since Coolfer quoted from it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The article currently says &quot;75% of those who clicked on the overlay watched the entire advert.&quot; That&#039;s not a click-through rate; that&#039;s a completion rate. The number of viewers who actually click on the ad overlay could be quite small.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Coolfer has it wrong&#8230; or the Telegraph article changed since Coolfer quoted from it.</p>
<p>
The article currently says &#8220;75% of those who clicked on the overlay watched the entire advert.&#8221; That&#8217;s not a click-through rate; that&#8217;s a completion rate. The number of viewers who actually click on the ad overlay could be quite small.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
