Radiohead Management To Fans: Please Buy “In Rainbows” On CD. Please.

October 11th, 2007 // 14 Comments

inrainbowssssss.jpgNot to say I called this, but, well, I pretty much called this:

Radiohead’s much-debated decision to let fans choose what they pay for its new album online is a promotional tactic to boost sales of compact discs, the band’s management said yesterday.

“If we didn’t believe that when people hear the music they will want to buy the CD, then we wouldn’t do what we are doing,” Bryce Edge of Courtyard Management told Music Week, the UK’s industry magazine.

The decision to release In Rainbows online and to allow buyers to pay as little as they like has been lauded by some analysts as a ground-breaking model for an industry struggling to compete with free illegal downloads.

As many as half of those who registered for the download had paid more than the minimum 45p transaction fee, Mr Edge indicated, but he described the initiative as “a solution for Radiohead, not the industry”, and defended the superior quality of CD recordings.
"You can't listen to a Radiohead record on MP3 [the digital music file standard] and hear the detail; it's impossible," Mr Edge said. "We can't understand why record companies don't go on the offensive and say what a great piece of kit CDs are. CDs are undervalued and sold too cheaply."

“Too cheaply”! Tell that to the poor suckers who shelled out $205 for a bunch of low-quality sound files. Anyway, this can only mean one thing: the Google Blog Search results for “in rainbows” + ripoff will be skyrocketing faster than you can say “self-righteous Internet anger.”

Radiohead MP3 release a tactic to lift CD sales [FT]

idolator

  1. Anonymous

    Did this really surprise anybody :)? I don’t really think this hurts their artistic credibility, and if they’ve put in the hard hours to have fans who want to drop serious bills to get albums in every possible format, then why not! I’m glad somebody’s innovating, but perhaps not to the level of William Hung:

    [www.humblenarrator.com]

  2. Anonymous

    You mean to say I can’t set my own price for the CD?

  3. Trackback

    BB reader Derek points us to the snapshot above, and says “The state of political action at Yale today. I’m afraid this is serious. The text chalked on the sidewalk in front of Yale’s main library says it all: ‘Smores for Darfur, All You Can Eat $2.’

  4. Trackback

    Radiohead’s “groundbreaking” decision to let fans choose what price to pay for 160k MP3s of “In Rainbows” was just a promotional tactic to boost CD sales, according to the band’s management.

  5. Richaod

    I’d like to know, can any non-audiophile actually tell the difference between, say, 160 and 192 (the accepted quality) kbps mp3s? Obviously there are currently no higher-quality versions of In Rainbows to compare, but I doubt that so many people would complain about it if they didn’t know what the bitrate was.

    Also, about the band’s comment that the audio quality is higher than that of the iTunes Store… Apple claims that a 128 kbps AAC file has twice the quality of an MP3 with the same encoding. Who’s right?

Leave A Comment