Comments on: “Blender” Openly Admits To Using Photoshop On Its New Issue’s Cover

By: Labels

Labels — Sun, 16 Jan 2011 07:08:11 +0000

Um…creepy psycho stare and those little baby hands could never squish a great big can of red bull like that…

By: Da7e

Da7e — Wed, 30 Jan 2008 06:01:10 +0000

And yet, Cracked who so artfully photoshopped their covers on a weekly basis went under.

Le sigh.

By: Cheap Shot

Cheap Shot — Tue, 29 Jan 2008 04:55:32 +0000

good photoshop: [www.vh1.com]

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 29 Jan 2008 02:01:54 +0000

"That, sadly, is not her body."

Feminism strides forward!

By: OingoBobo

OingoBobo — Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:57:10 +0000

They suck at Photardshop.
[youtube.com]

By: Cheap Shot

Cheap Shot — Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:32:47 +0000

Wow, I knew Blender was low on the intellegence meter but this is amazingly tardo.

By: The HZA. [member of the zombie nation]

The HZA. [member of the zombie nation] — Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:05:22 +0000

The ciggy's and Red Bull is the most accurate thing in the picture.

I don't get the tiny child hands.

By: Al Shipley

Al Shipley — Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:55:06 +0000

Is there any word on whether someone at Blender actually took the Britney picture from which the head was photoshopped onto a body double? Or did they just grab a headshot from Google Image Search (which is what it looks like, since her face looks a little younger than in recent photos there)?

By: Dick Laurent is dead.

Dick Laurent is dead. — Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:43:48 +0000

I love the juxtaposition of her haggard face (current) with the pristine-perfect body(-parts, no doubt a composite) of her past…surreal.

By: janine

janine — Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:09:40 +0000

That Britney stand-in has freakish baby/cartoon character hands.