Roger Waters Somehow Finds A Way To Make Me Loathe Pink Floyd Even More

AP080427024791.jpgI slogged through the first half of last night’s main-stage-closing set by Roger Waters–which was billed as “Roger Waters Dark Side Of The Moon“–partially out of masochism, partially in the interest of sociological research, and partially because I didn’t feel like dragging my ass over to the stuffed-to-capacity-all-weekend dance tent to see Modeselektor, who were the only other act playing for the first portion of Waters’ set. While it was interesting in a “so this is who he lured out to the desert” sort of way, it was also infuriating, and at one point a friend said to me, “I can hear your eyes rolling back from here.” But no portion of the evening filled me with more rage than the pre-show, which had as its visual an old-timey radio, a model airplane, and a tumbler of whiskey; every so often, a hand would reach into frame to change the station and/or refill the glass, and the stations that the hand hit on, for the most part, had a playlist that lulled the classic-rock fans in attendance into a state of self-righteousness: Bob Dylan, “Hound Dog,” and “My Funny Valentine.” There was also a “humorous” bit when the radio somehow was all-ABBA, all the time, and hand man couldn’t escape from the tyranny of radio! ABBA! I mean, could you believe the nerve!

Anyway, that little interlude made me wonder if our readers would be as dismayed by the fake radio offerings as Disembodied Hand Man was–so here’s a poll.

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you’re viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

I’m pretty sure that this is going to be lopsided in one direction, but hey, I may be wrong. The one good thing about Roger Waters’ set, though? It made me appreciate the greatness of Black Mountain even more. Holy balls were they fantastic.

 
1977 - Pink Floyd - Roger Waters | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
Pink Floyd & Roger Waters - Another Brick in the Wall, Pt. 1 - 2 - 3
Image 2 : Pink Floyd: Roger Waters
Pink Floyd - Roger Waters Has Married
Pink Floyd star Roger Waters married fourth wife Laurie Durning on Saturday (14.01.12. Pink Floyd star Roger Waters has married again. The 68-year-old musician tied the knot with his longtime fiancee Laurie Durning in front of just six guests at their home ...
Pink Floyd star Roger Waters married again
Los Angeles: The 68-year-old musician tied the knot with his longtime fiancee Laurie Durning in front of just six guests at their home in Southampton, New York last Saturday (14.01.12). News of the marriage was announced by radio DJ Howard Stern ...



 
  1. Anonymous  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    Waters has always been utterly douchetastic. Long before he actually died, Barrett was already turning over in his grave.
    [blog.newsok.com]

  2. natepatrin  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    Kind of unfair, actually, since ABBA vs. post-Syd Floyd is more or less a coin flip for me. (At least if the post-Syd Floyd in question is their ‘71-’77 stuff.)

  3. bcapirigi  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    I wish ABBA had a laser show instead of a fucking Broadway show. Imagine the mindblowing majesty of listening to Super Trouper while being genuinely blinded by lights shining like the sun!

  4. drjimmy11  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    Wow. You guys can’t even get your antique irrational classic-rock hatreds right.

    David Gilmour is the one that supposedly ruined Pink Floyd after Barrett left. It’s not even close to true of course, but that’s the tired-ass cliche.

  5. Chris N.  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    Oh, sweet, misguided Maura. I can feel only sympathy.

  6. Audif Jackson Winters III  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008
  7. Maura Johnston  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    @drjimmy11: yes, but he was not the one on stage last night.

  8. Maura Johnston  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    @drjimmy11: also, i put in the ‘post-syd’ caveat because it’s the no. 1 caveat used by people to explain away their sympathies for the band. which is fine! but last night’s set was just an unending slog.

  9. Elijah-M  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    How exactly does Roger Waters’ solo performance detract from the merits of a band that he hasn’t been a member of for over a quarter century? This would be like saying that Stone Temple Pilots were horrible because of Velvet Revolver (although contrary to what some on this blog have claimed, STPs were plenty horrible on their own).

  10. extracrispy  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    Here’s an even better poll: Why did Nick Denton unload Idolator?

    A. Because its pageviews per post hover around the 500 mark.
    B. Because its editors apparently have no appreciation for music history.

    Oh wait, those answers are entirely related.

  11. Maura Johnston  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    @Elijah-M: because he played mostly pink floyd songs and closed out the night with a performance of ‘dark side of the moon’?

    and there is a difference between ‘music history’ and ‘hoary overblown crap that i wouldn’t have liked if it had been made during this decade, either.’

  12. moomintroll  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    I’m totally baffled! Why wouldn’t you go see Modeselektor? Especially if the deep seeded hatred for Roger Waters you seem to have is real. Believe me, give me ABBA anyday over post Syd Barrett Pink Floyd. But, really give me Modeselektor over any of them. (Well except for Piper At The Gates Of Dawn I suppose?)

  13. iantenna  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    god i hate to jump on the classic rock dickhead train but this post was just ridiculous. of course roger waters’ sucked last night, but that doesn’t take away from his previous accomplishments. meddle is one of the greatest records of all-time and another reason that 1971 was the best year ever for albums.

  14. Maura Johnston  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    @moomintroll: more than anything, it was the location — the tent they were playing in was a disaster zone every time i tried to get within even 50 yards of it, and i figured that the fact that they were the only alternative to waters would only intensify the log jam. (hoping that gets remedied next year.)

  15. Anonymous  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    So what did the Sean Penn appearances turn out to be?

  16. Maura Johnston  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    @whoneedslight: ah, yeah, that. he was gathering people onto a bus “spontaneously,” and those who chose to go would be whisked off for a week of volunteerism and ben harper serenades.

  17. janine  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    I’d personally pick Pink Floyd over ABBA (ABBA’s got a timbre I can’t take over the long haul). That said, I think the post is right on. It’s unwise to go around downing great songwriters with a 30 yr old “death to disco” argument.

  18. dog door  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    please. roger waters’ WORST solo album blows away 50% of the crap that gets face time on this blog. Someone who spends so much time thinking and writing about R Kelly, Hanna Montana, and Brittney Spears obviously isn’t going to be into Pink Floyd.

  19. janine  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    If you wanted to focus on old albums, would you even need as immediate a medium as a blog? Just sayin’

  20. Anonymous  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    @Maura Johnston:

    Ouch. Don’t people have jobs?

  21. Maura Johnston  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    @whoneedslight: the fact that he said ‘let’s party’ for the first time in 28 years was supposed to make them forget about their day-to-day drudgery.

  22. JohnDoe  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    @dog door:
    whoa, there. Say what you want about Britney and Hannah, but don’t tell me that R. Kelly hasn’t written some of the best R&B of the last 20 years.
    (not saying he shouldn’t be in jail, tho)

  23. GhostOfDuane  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    Coming from an unapologetic classic rock lover (and q104 listener! OK i apologize for that much), Roger Waters is awful. His work is impenetrably dense and wordy, his voice intensely grating, and he sucked all the creative energy out of his band mates, starting with Dark Side and ending with the unspeakable, unlistenable abomination that is The Final Cut. Gilmour’s Floyd and post-floyd solo stuff has been so much better than Waters’ that Waters insists on hanging on to play his masterpiece to anyone with $100k to burn just so he can think of himself as Pink Floyd. he should just retire to his beloved golf course, where he can annoy his caddy with his nonsensical, creepy rants.

  24. @janine: really. that’s what music magazines are for.

  25. Ned Raggett  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    Okay, all the Roger Waters defenders on this thread are seriously making my head spin. Where did you come from, why are you content to parrot the worst classic-rock-loving lunkheads I’ve met over the years, and when might it occur to you that people have different points of you than your own?

  26. Ned Raggett  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    (Points of VIEW, rather. Anyway.)

  27. King of Pants  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    @Ned Raggett: It’s as if they were frozen in amber, preserved for all time, eternal, unchanging and fossilized.

    Did you know that rock music is like fascism, thus perhaps causing its practitioners to retreat behind a metaphor? You know, like a door or something?

  28. extracrispy  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    @Ned Raggett: Are you serious? This post was little more than “I hate Pink Floyd.” How that translates to a critique of the music industry, I have no idea.

    In any case, you expect people who do have a different point of view to just bow down and play along? Is that how you get a star?

  29. Nicolars  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    @Ned Raggett: They’re just making me laugh! It’s like an extracrispy serving of pissy middle-aged defensiveness.

  30. janine  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    You kids get out of my yard!!!

  31. Ned Raggett  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    @Nicolars: Based on the response just now, extracrispy has reached levels Zen koans can’t even touch.

  32. Clevertrousers  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    The only thing I like about Pink Floyd is that they helped make punk necessary. So did Abba, but at least I can sing along to their songs with my neice.

  33. Clevertrousers  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    Also, I sat through Tom Stoppard’s “Rock and Roll” and couldn’t stop giggling at all the dunderheaded Syd Barrett = “Pan, the God of Hedonism” references. If it wasn’t for the bizarre chance to see a Broadway tribute to the Plastic People of the Universive, I would have pissed myself laughing.

  34. mike a  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    Now you’ve done it, Maura. As I learned back at the college newspaper, there’s no troll like a post-Syd Pink Floyd troll. If you dare insult their idol(s), they will accuse you of having no taste and stupid to boot.

    It’s only a matter of time before Waters and Ron Paul join forces for the most annoying troll tag-team of all time.

  35. natepatrin  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    @Clevertrousers: Funny thing is, now I’m kind of waiting for something to save us from punk. One more CBGB’s coffee table book and people are gonna pay.

  36. bcapirigi  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    No, really. Can we please talk about how awesome ABBA are? Their third album could totally kick the ass of any stupid Pink Floyd record regardless of who was on it. Hell, just Hey Hey Helen’s better than the entire PF catalog–COMBINED. Bang-A-Boomerang? Could kick The Wall’s ass.

    Sorry. I really had to say that, though.

  37. Clevertrousers  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    @natepatrin: I thought John Varvatos saved us from Punk?

  38. Clevertrousers  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    @bcapirigi: I couldn’t agree more. Also, “Fernando” managed to say more about the emotional politics of Latin American cold war politcal turmoil than all six frickin’ sides of Sandinista!

  39. Elijah-M  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    @Maura Johnston: So if I see the Rolling Stones today, and they do a bunch of Rolling Stones songs, and they suck, does that mean that the records they were making 40 years ago also sucked? You tell me. You’re obviously a lot smarter than I am. I mean, you chose to spend two hours listening to a bunch of music that you don’t even like. You obviously understand this stuff on a much deeper level than I.

    There are many compelling ways to talk about what a self-absorbed, pretentious dickhead Roger Waters is. “ABBA, who I like, is better than Pink Floyd, who I hate” is not one of them.

  40. Nicolars  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    @bcapirigi: Now see, I could understand ABBA having a lot of indignant and angry mangroupies because they are fantastic. But Roger Waters? Really?

  41. Elijah-M  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    @Nicolars: I think it has a lot more to do with Pink Floyd than with Roger Waters. From what I understand, when he performs live, he tends to drag the Pink Floyd songs down to the quality level of his solo output, which is universally horrible.

  42. Anonymous  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    @King of Pants: If that Jurassic Park metaphor is pushed, does that make Wolfmother some sort of hermaphroditic frog?

  43. Maura Johnston  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    My point is that the offhand abba dis pretty much summed up everything I’ve disliked about the band since I first heard them long ago. I find them really ponderous and impenetrable and I don’t see why waters had to go out of his way to mock a band with actual hooks and choruses. Even if it was motivated by jealousy (oh no I didn’t!!) it was a cheap shot, and since so many of you seem angered by the one that I apparently sent his way, why cant I be annoyed for similar reasons? Turnabout, fair play, etc.

    Ps I’m typing this on my phone so forgive any typos.

  44. Elijah-M  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    @Maura Johnston: Because your cheap shot is significantly less clever than his; and it’s not like he set the bar high.

  45. Charlie Kerfelds Jetsons Tee  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    Next up on Idolator: “Tool: not all they’re cracked up to be” and “Radiohead: Really?”

  46. revmatty  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    I voted for ABBA only because I find them just slightly less unlistenable than Pink Floyd.

  47. extracrispy  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    @Charlie Kerfelds Jetsons Tee: Dude, that’s Idolator every day! On the very long list of bands Idolator hates: Pink Floyd, The Doors, Nine Inch Nails, Angels & Airwaves, Muse (?!), Coldplay, etc, etc etc.

    I’ve been reading this blog for nearly two years and I can only name two artists that Idolator genuinely likes: Prince (as of this morning) and Kanye Fucking West.

    It just seems like pissing off your potential readership is probably not the best way to sustain an audience. Also, why the fuck are you people in music journalism?

  48. Maura Johnston  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    @extracrispy: you do know that multiple people have written for the site, right? Apparently not because I’ve never dissed NIN once.

  49. Maura Johnston  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    I mean. I talk about bands I like a lot. But apparently our tastes don’t overlap. Which, you know, happens, but it certainly doesn’t mean that I hate music on the whole. Maybe the disses (and perceived disses) stick out to you more?

  50. extracrispy  |   Posted on Apr 28th, 2008

    @Maura Johnston: Uh, you’re the editor. Or did Jess Harvell slip the “everything sucks but Kanye” tone by you while you were listening to your ABBA records?

Leave a Reply

Sign In Login