R. Kelly Courtroom Hears Claims Of Basketball Court Three-Ways, Duffel Bags Full Of Porn, And Federal Fraud
While she and Pryor were together, Pryor told her “how you interject yourself into a case – that you go at the last minute” with important testimony, she said. Van Allen agreed with [defense lawyer Sam] Adam that Pryor was a “conman,” describing their relationship as “a mistake.”
Adam pointed out that Van Allen had not come forward for nearly five-and-a-half years as a witness against Kelly, suggesting a link between Pryor’s advice and her late emergence as a witness.
But Van Allen denied telling Pryor that the tape at the center of the case was a fake, or that she had told him she planned to extort cash from Kelly. She denied telling a Minnesota woman the same thing, also denying that she knew two men called “Chuck and Keith” had staged the tape at the center of the case to get money from Kelly.
Chuck and Keith? Are they sure they don’t mean Chuck and…Rufus?
Did the prosecution really put up a late-arriving witness with lurid stories and a history of dallying with men convicted of fraud? Do they know how easy it is for a circus like this to inspire reasonable doubt? And…Keith…CHUCK?!
Van Allen: we had three-way sex on R. Kelly’s basketball court [Chicago Sun-Times] R. Kelly’s attorneys paint Lisa Van Allen as thief, extortionist [Chicago Sun-Times] R.Kelly-Trapped In The Closet Chapter 11 [YouTube]