200px-BjorkVespertine.jpeg.jpgBjork offers journalists a lesson on the differences between engineering, programming, writing, and producing electronic music, in hopes that people will quit giving the wrong musicians credit when they’re talking about Vespertine and start double-checking the credit sheets if they’re thinking about praising specific people for specific recording tasks. [bjork.com via offnotesnotes]

 
Bjork Wallpaper - Wallpapers & Backgrounds
Pictures of Bjork Tattoos
Bjork
Bjork Brings Her Engaging Spectacle to the New York Hall of Science
"Are you enjoying Queens?" Björk asked with an exultant squeal during the February 3rd opening of her Biophilia residency at the New York Hall of Science in Flushing Meadows. It was a peculiar question during a performance set in an alternate ...
Quirky Bjork makes a foray into music education
NEW YORK _ Americans may know Bjork Guõmunsdottir best for that strange swan dress she wore at the 2000 Oscars. But now, after selling millions of recordings and videos _ not to mention being named best actress at the 2000 Cannes Film Festival ...



 
  1. Al Shipley  |   Posted on Aug 22nd, 2008

    That was a good read! It’d be nice to have more standardized definitions of different roles in modern recording; what gets called “producing” in one genre might mean strictly engineering, while in another it means composing and programming/performing. And sometimes the liner notes are so ambiguous that you can’t tell the difference even if you read them.

  2. Dead Air ummm Dead Air  |   Posted on Aug 22nd, 2008

    @Al Shipley: Of course, reading liner notes necisiates you bought the physcial product…

    Kinda easy to make up titles when no one is double checking.

  3. Al Shipley  |   Posted on Aug 22nd, 2008

    @Dead Air ummm Dead Air: Ehh, with Wikipedia and such it’s never been easier to find credits for albums online, provided they’re not super obscure, and nowadays a lot of legal (and some illegal) album downloads come with a digital booklet attached.

  4. theminx  |   Posted on Aug 22nd, 2008

    Dear Bjork,

    I think you’re great etc. and totally take your point, but it’s pitchforkmedia.com, not pitchfork.com.

    Yours truly,

    A Fan

  5. Maura Johnston  |   Posted on Aug 22nd, 2008

    @theminx: actually they bought pitchfork.com a while ago, although it seems to be having problems loading right now…

  6. theminx  |   Posted on Aug 22nd, 2008

    Ah. My RSS feed is old school, man.

  7. marc h.  |   Posted on Aug 22nd, 2008

    not disagreeing with bjork’s bigger points here, but the reason i posted this on my tumblr was that i noticed apparent factual errors based on assumptions in her post telling people not to make factual errors based on assumptions.

    pot, kettle, ass out of u and me, etc. etc.

  8. Maura Johnston  |   Posted on Aug 22nd, 2008

    @marc h.: oh, i know. but i did think that the point about writers (including me!) needing to learn more about the process behind music was a salient one, and one that’s especially lost in the era of the downloadable, liner-noteless ‘promo.’ (cough cough.)

  9. Anonymous  |   Posted on Aug 22nd, 2008

    @Maura Johnston: Props to you for acknowledging that most writers don’t know shit.

Leave a Reply

Sign In Login