Bob Dylan has a pair of poems, titled “17″ and “21,” in the new issue of The New Yorker. All well and good, but I fear that some contrarians won’t be convinced of his genius until he pens a caption for a cartoon. [The New Yorker]

 
Bob Dylan will launch an Asian tour « Bestbron
bob-dylan
Bob Dylan | TopNews
LAUREN DALEY: Rocker Joe Louis Walker has done — and played — it all
He talked to me for over an hour about everything from American history and health care to Bob Dylan and Elvis Costello. He's got a fascinating take on every subject. JLW on Dylan: "Bob said, 'I love Woody Guthrie, but I'm not Woody Guthrie.
Matthew Ryan on Bob Dylan
How did you first get into Bob Dylan? I can’t remember not being a Bob Dylan fan. For a songwriter, it’s like asking when did you get into breathing? How has he influenced your music? In Dylan’s work there’s always been a progressive traditionalism.



 
  1. Mordy  |   Posted on Sep 15th, 2008

    I love Bob Dylan, but these poems are really subpar. “17″ is a restatement of the themes in Ballad of a Thin Man, but without music accompanying, it sounds flakey and all over the place. That said, I love his Marlon Brando conclusion. “21″ is just plain bad, and tho it evokes some nice 1930s+40s noir (it reminds me of Sunset Blvd), it’s also a total cliche in 2008.

    So, yeah, Bobby D. Stick to the music.

  2. okiedoke  |   Posted on Sep 15th, 2008

    Forget the caption. He should do a cover. The guy can paint.

  3. TheContrarian  |   Posted on Sep 15th, 2008

    Umm, like this Contrarian?

  4. Clevertrousers  |   Posted on Sep 15th, 2008

    The cat is saying “I’ve enjoyed reading your E-mail”.

  5. Audif Jackson Winters III  |   Posted on Sep 15th, 2008

    I’m disappointed that “17″ didn’t have at least a veiled reference to Kip Winger.

Leave a Reply

Sign In Login