<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SoundScan Holds Itself Back For Axl</title>
	<atom:link href="http://idolator.com/5098553/soundscan-holds-itself-back-for-axl/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idolator.com/5098553/soundscan-holds-itself-back-for-axl</link>
	<description>Music News, Reviews, and Gossip on Idolator.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:30:15 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Molanphy</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5098553/soundscan-holds-itself-back-for-axl/comment-page-1#comment-777832</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Molanphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 04:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">8d595746c63d7b81082ef133a7a1fae3#comment-777832</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is probably lost in the mists of time, but I distinctly remember reading about similar shenanigans in 1987 re: Michael Jackson&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Bad&lt;/i&gt;. (Stop me if I&#039;ve told this story before.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Earlier that year, Whitney Houston&#039;s second album had debuted at No. 1, a coup for Arista Records and for a relatively new artist in the era before Soundscan, when No. 1 debuts were exceedingly rare. It then became absolutely imperative for Epic Records that &lt;i&gt;Bad&lt;/i&gt; do the same.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to a thinly veiled, grumbly item in &lt;i&gt;Billboard&lt;/i&gt; that I read that September (man, I wish I still had that old copy of the magazine), Epic prevailed upon retailers to withhold reporting sales of &lt;i&gt;Bad&lt;/i&gt;, which like &lt;i&gt;Chinese Democracy&lt;/i&gt; had an off-cycle release date, to ensure a No. 1 debut. Just digging through BB&#039;s online archives, I don&#039;t think my memory is failing me: &lt;i&gt;Bad&lt;/i&gt; was released on Aug. 31, yet it didn&#039;t debut until the album chart dated Sep. 26. Even allowing for the usual lag between compiling data and the &lt;i&gt;Billboard&lt;/i&gt; issue date, that&#039;s an absurd lag of nearly a month.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In short, retailer/label crap like this is old as the hills, where a priority release is concerned.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is probably lost in the mists of time, but I distinctly remember reading about similar shenanigans in 1987 re: Michael Jackson&#8217;s <i>Bad</i>. (Stop me if I&#8217;ve told this story before.)</p>
<p>Earlier that year, Whitney Houston&#8217;s second album had debuted at No. 1, a coup for Arista Records and for a relatively new artist in the era before Soundscan, when No. 1 debuts were exceedingly rare. It then became absolutely imperative for Epic Records that <i>Bad</i> do the same.</p>
<p>According to a thinly veiled, grumbly item in <i>Billboard</i> that I read that September (man, I wish I still had that old copy of the magazine), Epic prevailed upon retailers to withhold reporting sales of <i>Bad</i>, which like <i>Chinese Democracy</i> had an off-cycle release date, to ensure a No. 1 debut. Just digging through BB&#8217;s online archives, I don&#8217;t think my memory is failing me: <i>Bad</i> was released on Aug. 31, yet it didn&#8217;t debut until the album chart dated Sep. 26. Even allowing for the usual lag between compiling data and the <i>Billboard</i> issue date, that&#8217;s an absurd lag of nearly a month.</p>
<p>In short, retailer/label crap like this is old as the hills, where a priority release is concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris N.</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5098553/soundscan-holds-itself-back-for-axl/comment-page-1#comment-777842</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">8d595746c63d7b81082ef133a7a1fae3#comment-777842</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;... and the Nickelback will still be Top 20 in 2010, and no one will be able to figure out how that&#039;s possible since we won&#039;t know anyone who owns a copy.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; and the Nickelback will still be Top 20 in 2010, and no one will be able to figure out how that&#8217;s possible since we won&#8217;t know anyone who owns a copy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maura Johnston</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5098553/soundscan-holds-itself-back-for-axl/comment-page-1#comment-777852</link>
		<dc:creator>Maura Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 02:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">8d595746c63d7b81082ef133a7a1fae3#comment-777852</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@&lt;a href=&quot;#c9109884&quot;&gt;2ironic4u&lt;/a&gt;: 300kish.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9109884">2ironic4u</a>: 300kish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5098553/soundscan-holds-itself-back-for-axl/comment-page-1#comment-777862</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 02:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">8d595746c63d7b81082ef133a7a1fae3#comment-777862</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What are they predicting for Nickelback&#039;s first week sales.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are they predicting for Nickelback&#8217;s first week sales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
