<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hey Everybody, It&#8217;s Time To Argue Over Pitchfork&#8217;s Best Albums List</title>
	<atom:link href="http://idolator.com/5114090/hey-everybody-its-time-to-argue-over-pitchforks-best-albums-list/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idolator.com/5114090/hey-everybody-its-time-to-argue-over-pitchforks-best-albums-list</link>
	<description>Music News, Reviews, and Gossip on Idolator.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:30:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5114090/hey-everybody-its-time-to-argue-over-pitchforks-best-albums-list/comment-page-2#comment-800392</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 06:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">12f3254980549aacf14ab7404d0b22e6#comment-800392</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I just want to say, I love Cut Copy, and love love love that In Ghost Colours (my personal album of the year) scored so high, especially above the (somewhat overrated imo) Hercules and Love Affair. And although HaLA beat cut copy for the #1 single, I was happy with cut copy scoring two high spots on the top singles/tracks list.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[mini-rant] About pfork&#039;s &quot;top tracks&quot; methodology...there is a problem there. They say they are now looking at any TRACKS, not just singles. but then how can they chart songs that were released in 2007 and only became SINGLES this year? That doesn&#039;t make any sense. &quot;Flashing Lights,&quot; I&#039;m looking at you. Especially because my friends and I (and maybe pretty much everyone?) thought flashing lights was amazing back when Graduation came out last year. It was one of my favorite tracks of 2007 (but then so were Stronger and Can&#039;t Tell Me Nothin). did pfork just miss it? [/rant]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;oh, and f*** fleet foxes. that shit is boring.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want to say, I love Cut Copy, and love love love that In Ghost Colours (my personal album of the year) scored so high, especially above the (somewhat overrated imo) Hercules and Love Affair. And although HaLA beat cut copy for the #1 single, I was happy with cut copy scoring two high spots on the top singles/tracks list.</p>
<p>[mini-rant] About pfork&#8217;s &#8220;top tracks&#8221; methodology&#8230;there is a problem there. They say they are now looking at any TRACKS, not just singles. but then how can they chart songs that were released in 2007 and only became SINGLES this year? That doesn&#8217;t make any sense. &#8220;Flashing Lights,&#8221; I&#8217;m looking at you. Especially because my friends and I (and maybe pretty much everyone?) thought flashing lights was amazing back when Graduation came out last year. It was one of my favorite tracks of 2007 (but then so were Stronger and Can&#8217;t Tell Me Nothin). did pfork just miss it? [/rant]</p>
<p>oh, and f*** fleet foxes. that shit is boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mhulot</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5114090/hey-everybody-its-time-to-argue-over-pitchforks-best-albums-list/comment-page-2#comment-800402</link>
		<dc:creator>mhulot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 05:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">12f3254980549aacf14ab7404d0b22e6#comment-800402</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe it&#039;s not surprising, maybe there&#039;s something vaguely annoying about Pitchfork&#039;s general tone (in all things, not just the list), etc. - maybe, but, on the other hand, this is one of the better lists I&#039;ve seen so far, and if not exactly adventurous it is relatively diverse (so happy to see Erykah Badu up there, even if I&#039;m baffled how anyone could prefer the Fleet Foxes to Badu&#039;s new one... I&#039;m not exactly a FF hater, and they&#039;re certainly preferable to other recent country-tinged bearded critical darlings from Seattle I could name, but don&#039;t hear much to get excited about in the songs I&#039;ve heard). And Pitchfork does stand by its convictions (they probably have more unique-ish picks on their list than most others, not counting lists made by individual critics, who are naturally more eclectically-inclined than grouped lists), which is kind of admirable even if you find those convictions to be occasionally head-scratching.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Basically, what I&#039;m implying without really making much of an effort to mount an actual argument is that Pitchfork is, among the aboveground publications devoted to writing about and reviewing new music, one of the better music pub&#039;s out there. And I do think that the quality of the writing and the thoughtfulness of the opinions expressed has consistently improved over the past few years. Given the current state of music writing and the presence of much more virulent annoyances out there (Hey Stereogum! How&#039;s it going?), Pitchfork is, on balance, a good thing. And, again, I like the list. But, seriously, Fleet Foxes over Portishead or Badu... really?!? And I know they&#039;re reissues but will somebody please give Steinski and Franco some love. Please?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s not surprising, maybe there&#8217;s something vaguely annoying about Pitchfork&#8217;s general tone (in all things, not just the list), etc. &#8211; maybe, but, on the other hand, this is one of the better lists I&#8217;ve seen so far, and if not exactly adventurous it is relatively diverse (so happy to see Erykah Badu up there, even if I&#8217;m baffled how anyone could prefer the Fleet Foxes to Badu&#8217;s new one&#8230; I&#8217;m not exactly a FF hater, and they&#8217;re certainly preferable to other recent country-tinged bearded critical darlings from Seattle I could name, but don&#8217;t hear much to get excited about in the songs I&#8217;ve heard). And Pitchfork does stand by its convictions (they probably have more unique-ish picks on their list than most others, not counting lists made by individual critics, who are naturally more eclectically-inclined than grouped lists), which is kind of admirable even if you find those convictions to be occasionally head-scratching.</p>
<p>Basically, what I&#8217;m implying without really making much of an effort to mount an actual argument is that Pitchfork is, among the aboveground publications devoted to writing about and reviewing new music, one of the better music pub&#8217;s out there. And I do think that the quality of the writing and the thoughtfulness of the opinions expressed has consistently improved over the past few years. Given the current state of music writing and the presence of much more virulent annoyances out there (Hey Stereogum! How&#8217;s it going?), Pitchfork is, on balance, a good thing. And, again, I like the list. But, seriously, Fleet Foxes over Portishead or Badu&#8230; really?!? And I know they&#8217;re reissues but will somebody please give Steinski and Franco some love. Please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AL</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5114090/hey-everybody-its-time-to-argue-over-pitchforks-best-albums-list/comment-page-2#comment-800422</link>
		<dc:creator>AL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 03:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">12f3254980549aacf14ab7404d0b22e6#comment-800422</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@&lt;a href=&quot;#c9598867&quot;&gt;sofatruck&lt;/a&gt;: ehh, i meant more in the sense of having an informed critical opinion, as opposed to just liking/disliking something. i don&#039;t understand all the negativity directed toward the album in the comments, but maybe it&#039;s because they know something i don&#039;t, like that what CC is doing has been done before, but better. or that it&#039;s extremely easy to do so long as you have wealthy parents willing to buy you a mac book. etc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(and i don&#039;t mean to imply that cultivated critical opinions necessarily exist on a higher plane than basic likes/dislikes. i personally enjoy the CC album, and if gaining knowledge about the genre means losing that pleasure i get from listening to it, i&#039;m not sure that&#039;s a positive outcome.)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9598867">sofatruck</a>: ehh, i meant more in the sense of having an informed critical opinion, as opposed to just liking/disliking something. i don&#8217;t understand all the negativity directed toward the album in the comments, but maybe it&#8217;s because they know something i don&#8217;t, like that what CC is doing has been done before, but better. or that it&#8217;s extremely easy to do so long as you have wealthy parents willing to buy you a mac book. etc.</p>
<p>(and i don&#8217;t mean to imply that cultivated critical opinions necessarily exist on a higher plane than basic likes/dislikes. i personally enjoy the CC album, and if gaining knowledge about the genre means losing that pleasure i get from listening to it, i&#8217;m not sure that&#8217;s a positive outcome.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5114090/hey-everybody-its-time-to-argue-over-pitchforks-best-albums-list/comment-page-2#comment-800432</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 03:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">12f3254980549aacf14ab7404d0b22e6#comment-800432</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@&lt;a href=&quot;#c9597806&quot;&gt;AL&lt;/a&gt;: who says &#039;knowing&#039; about XYZ genre is a prerequisite for liking something.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9597806">AL</a>: who says &#8216;knowing&#8217; about XYZ genre is a prerequisite for liking something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5114090/hey-everybody-its-time-to-argue-over-pitchforks-best-albums-list/comment-page-2#comment-800442</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 03:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">12f3254980549aacf14ab7404d0b22e6#comment-800442</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Fleet Foxes is a pretty safe but unexciting choice, for a online magazine that claims to be the flag bearer of underground music.  Happy to so the ridiculous backlash against Vampire Weekend is ceasing and for the high placement of Portishead, No Age and the Erykah Badu albums.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And thank god there is no Gaslight Anthem.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fleet Foxes is a pretty safe but unexciting choice, for a online magazine that claims to be the flag bearer of underground music.  Happy to so the ridiculous backlash against Vampire Weekend is ceasing and for the high placement of Portishead, No Age and the Erykah Badu albums.</p>
<p>And thank god there is no Gaslight Anthem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maura Johnston</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5114090/hey-everybody-its-time-to-argue-over-pitchforks-best-albums-list/comment-page-2#comment-800412</link>
		<dc:creator>Maura Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 03:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">12f3254980549aacf14ab7404d0b22e6#comment-800412</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@&lt;a href=&quot;#c9597599&quot;&gt;Freakytrigger&lt;/a&gt;: hi tom!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;yeah, you know, i think a lot of the people who are like &#039;OMG PITCHFORK GAVE THIS A 7.1 IN APRIL HOW CAN IT BE GOOD NOW&#039; are forgetting (intentionally or not?) the whole idea of the &#039;grower.&#039; shoot, the hercules &amp; love affair album was one of those for me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;of course this could get into a whole discussion of whether the internet allows for records to grow on you etc etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9597599">Freakytrigger</a>: hi tom!</p>
<p>yeah, you know, i think a lot of the people who are like &#8216;OMG PITCHFORK GAVE THIS A 7.1 IN APRIL HOW CAN IT BE GOOD NOW&#8217; are forgetting (intentionally or not?) the whole idea of the &#8216;grower.&#8217; shoot, the hercules &amp; love affair album was one of those for me.</p>
<p>of course this could get into a whole discussion of whether the internet allows for records to grow on you etc etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halfwit</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5114090/hey-everybody-its-time-to-argue-over-pitchforks-best-albums-list/comment-page-2#comment-800452</link>
		<dc:creator>Halfwit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 02:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">12f3254980549aacf14ab7404d0b22e6#comment-800452</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@&lt;a href=&quot;#c9597599&quot;&gt;Freakytrigger&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;i&gt;animated .gif of jon stewart fanning himself with flashing &quot;Oh my God&quot; text.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;@&lt;a href=&quot;#c9589050&quot;&gt;Nunya B&lt;/a&gt;: I&#039;m sorry. I love &lt;i&gt;Made in the Dark&lt;/i&gt; so hard it&#039;s a little scary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Without piggybacking on Stereogum&#039;s post-mortem (heaven forbid), I really agree with p&#039;fork&#039;s analysis of Vampire Weekend. I settled on a different quote than the stereogum did, however:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;At the end of the day, all they&#039;ve done is craft an album of crisp, endlessly replayable guitar pop songs with expressive, detail-heavy lyrics and charming music that serves as a welcome antidote to today&#039;s more overly compressed sounds. How dare they.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9597599">Freakytrigger</a>: <i>animated .gif of jon stewart fanning himself with flashing &#8220;Oh my God&#8221; text.</i></p>
<p>@<a href="#c9589050">Nunya B</a>: I&#8217;m sorry. I love <i>Made in the Dark</i> so hard it&#8217;s a little scary.</p>
<p>Without piggybacking on Stereogum&#8217;s post-mortem (heaven forbid), I really agree with p&#8217;fork&#8217;s analysis of Vampire Weekend. I settled on a different quote than the stereogum did, however:</p>
<p><i>At the end of the day, all they&#8217;ve done is craft an album of crisp, endlessly replayable guitar pop songs with expressive, detail-heavy lyrics and charming music that serves as a welcome antidote to today&#8217;s more overly compressed sounds. How dare they.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AL</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5114090/hey-everybody-its-time-to-argue-over-pitchforks-best-albums-list/comment-page-2#comment-800462</link>
		<dc:creator>AL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">12f3254980549aacf14ab7404d0b22e6#comment-800462</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i thought i didn&#039;t like crystal castles, until i actually listened to it a few times. i think it&#039;s a fun album, but then i know next to nothing about electronic music.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i thought i didn&#8217;t like crystal castles, until i actually listened to it a few times. i think it&#8217;s a fun album, but then i know next to nothing about electronic music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freakytrigger</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5114090/hey-everybody-its-time-to-argue-over-pitchforks-best-albums-list/comment-page-2#comment-800472</link>
		<dc:creator>Freakytrigger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">12f3254980549aacf14ab7404d0b22e6#comment-800472</guid>
		<description>&lt;P&gt;@&lt;A href=&quot;http://idolator.com/5114090/hey-everybody-its-time-to-argue-over-pitchforks-best-albums-list#c9589050&quot;&gt;Nunya B&lt;/A&gt;: As the giver of that 7.1 to Santogold, I&#039;m glad it made it onto the list. The stuff I disliked at the time of reviewing stopped annoying me so much, and the stuff I liked stayed good. Obviously other staffers liked it well enough too.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://idolator.com/5114090/hey-everybody-its-time-to-argue-over-pitchforks-best-albums-list#c9589050">Nunya B</a>: As the giver of that 7.1 to Santogold, I&#8217;m glad it made it onto the list. The stuff I disliked at the time of reviewing stopped annoying me so much, and the stuff I liked stayed good. Obviously other staffers liked it well enough too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: natepatrin</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5114090/hey-everybody-its-time-to-argue-over-pitchforks-best-albums-list/comment-page-1#comment-800482</link>
		<dc:creator>natepatrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">12f3254980549aacf14ab7404d0b22e6#comment-800482</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@&lt;a href=&quot;#c9593969&quot;&gt;Maciej&lt;/a&gt;: Fair enough. I&#039;m sort of a dance music geek (amongst other, supposedly incompatible geekeries like indie rap and dubstep -- and holy shit, did dubstep have a pretty good year or what), and I didn&#039;t hear too much attrition or entropy in house music this year, though maybe part of that was informed by all the stuff I found with the phrase &quot;Aeroplane Remix&quot; attached. That, and I went on a Discodust bender for a few months and found plenty to like, electro-scuzzy and balearic as a lot of it was.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, lack of danceability has little to do with my disappointment over &lt;i&gt;Seventh Tree&lt;/i&gt; -- I would&#039;ve liked it a lot more if it had material that was as engagingly weird and vocally gripping as &quot;Pilots&quot; or &quot;Lovely Head&quot; or some of the other choice pre-electro &lt;i&gt;Felt Mountain&lt;/i&gt; material. (And &quot;A&amp;E&quot; got remixed anyways.) Still, I ain&#039;t gonna begrudge anyone their enjoyment of it, at least not in retrospect.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9593969">Maciej</a>: Fair enough. I&#8217;m sort of a dance music geek (amongst other, supposedly incompatible geekeries like indie rap and dubstep &#8212; and holy shit, did dubstep have a pretty good year or what), and I didn&#8217;t hear too much attrition or entropy in house music this year, though maybe part of that was informed by all the stuff I found with the phrase &#8220;Aeroplane Remix&#8221; attached. That, and I went on a Discodust bender for a few months and found plenty to like, electro-scuzzy and balearic as a lot of it was.</p>
<p>Also, lack of danceability has little to do with my disappointment over <i>Seventh Tree</i> &#8212; I would&#8217;ve liked it a lot more if it had material that was as engagingly weird and vocally gripping as &#8220;Pilots&#8221; or &#8220;Lovely Head&#8221; or some of the other choice pre-electro <i>Felt Mountain</i> material. (And &#8220;A&amp;E&#8221; got remixed anyways.) Still, I ain&#8217;t gonna begrudge anyone their enjoyment of it, at least not in retrospect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
