No, Really, Headbanging Is Bad For You?

Since even the British Medical Journal deserves a month off, they’ve taken the prestigious talents of the medical research community and turned decades of education into a research paper discussing the damage Beavis and Butt-Head would have done to the necks as compared to the injuries possibly sustained by Wayne and Garth. No kidding. There are graphs, even. [BMJ via Riverfront Times / Image via the most ridiculous eHow page ever]

Categories:
Uncategorized

8 Responses to “No, Really, Headbanging Is Bad For You?”

  1. by cookiedough at 3:41 am

    Best thing ever: “To minimise the risk of head and neck injury, head bangers should…head bang to slower tempo songs by replacing heavy metal with adult oriented rock…”

  2. by NeverEnough at 3:51 am

    This is from BMJ’s annual Christmas issue. They purposely publish goofy (yet medically accurate) articles. There’s also one titled: “Coca-Cola douches and contraception” in this week’s issue.

  3. by Maura Johnston at 4:03 am

    @NeverEnough: COCA COLA DOUCHES????

  4. by walkmasterflex at 4:20 am

    @Maura Johnston: sounds like an album dead kennedys or maybe negativland would put out

  5. by doublewhiskycokenoice at 4:38 am

    Hands down, the best part of this article is the following quote:

    “We randomly selected three songs (”I Will Always Love You” by Whitney Houston, “Hello” by Lionel Ritchie, and “Babe” by Styx) from on-line lists of easy listening and adult oriented rock as musical controls.”

  6. by at 4:39 am

    @walkmasterflex: The Fugs recorded a song called Cola-Cola Douche in the mid 60s. They were ahead of their time!

  7. by at 4:40 am

    oops…the Fugs song is “Coca-Cola Douche” not “Cola-Cola Douche”

  8. by NeverEnough at 6:36 am

    @Maura Johnston: Check your email. :)

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.