Comments on: The Beatles’ New Revolution http://idolator.com/5161164/the-beatles-new-revolution Music News, Reviews, and Gossip on Idolator.com Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:16:44 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: cheesebubble http://idolator.com/5161164/the-beatles-new-revolution/comment-page-1#comment-870382 cheesebubble Sat, 28 Feb 2009 01:51:13 +0000 44150f0008b0ca4b2f2f4b3b06b59d8d#comment-870382 <p>Cool. I'm always willing to entertain Beatles rarities. They'll never get old.</p> Cool. I’m always willing to entertain Beatles rarities. They’ll never get old.

]]> By: Anonymous http://idolator.com/5161164/the-beatles-new-revolution/comment-page-1#comment-870392 Anonymous Fri, 27 Feb 2009 05:38:32 +0000 44150f0008b0ca4b2f2f4b3b06b59d8d#comment-870392 <p>It is the real take 20 friends...</p> <p>John left with the only take of this...and although there have been only monitor tapes (back in the day it was cheaper and you didn't have to go through the red tape of seeking approval from EMI to make a reference acetate - so you just had a tape recorder and a mic taping the mixes so that you as a Beatle could just take it home with you and reference that and come back in and work having prepped yourself for the next day of recording....this isn't fiction...there are pics of them doing this...and it's widely noted...but back to our story...)</p> <p>There is a monitor tape with Yoko talking all over it into the microphone (specifically this was John's tape so she was saying things about their relationship to him...) but in the backround you can hear this mix...</p> <p>The detailed notes on this day state that John Lennon took the mixed tape of Take 20 (mono mix) home with him...</p> <p>This is that tape...this isn't a fake...it's been gone over on all Beatle forums and some audio forums...</p> <p>Listen to it until it's gone...</p> <p>Also...remember that Rev#9 was actually MADE from this take of Rev#1...Lennon has said so...that it is what happens after the fade on the record that constitutes what Rev#9's main content is...</p> <p>Hope that clears most of this up...</p> <p>This is a really significant find!</p> It is the real take 20 friends…

John left with the only take of this…and although there have been only monitor tapes (back in the day it was cheaper and you didn’t have to go through the red tape of seeking approval from EMI to make a reference acetate – so you just had a tape recorder and a mic taping the mixes so that you as a Beatle could just take it home with you and reference that and come back in and work having prepped yourself for the next day of recording….this isn’t fiction…there are pics of them doing this…and it’s widely noted…but back to our story…)

There is a monitor tape with Yoko talking all over it into the microphone (specifically this was John’s tape so she was saying things about their relationship to him…) but in the backround you can hear this mix…

The detailed notes on this day state that John Lennon took the mixed tape of Take 20 (mono mix) home with him…

This is that tape…this isn’t a fake…it’s been gone over on all Beatle forums and some audio forums…

Listen to it until it’s gone…

Also…remember that Rev#9 was actually MADE from this take of Rev#1…Lennon has said so…that it is what happens after the fade on the record that constitutes what Rev#9’s main content is…

Hope that clears most of this up…

This is a really significant find!

]]> By: King of Pants http://idolator.com/5161164/the-beatles-new-revolution/comment-page-1#comment-870402 King of Pants Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:50:48 +0000 44150f0008b0ca4b2f2f4b3b06b59d8d#comment-870402 <p>Sounds less like a different take and more like a mashup.</p> Sounds less like a different take and more like a mashup.

]]> By: Lucas Jensen http://idolator.com/5161164/the-beatles-new-revolution/comment-page-1#comment-870412 Lucas Jensen Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:12:49 +0000 44150f0008b0ca4b2f2f4b3b06b59d8d#comment-870412 <p>@<a href="#c11015618">kicking222</a>: It's definitely the slow White Album version leading into the beginnings of #9, I think.</p> @kicking222: It’s definitely the slow White Album version leading into the beginnings of #9, I think.

]]> By: Chris N. http://idolator.com/5161164/the-beatles-new-revolution/comment-page-1#comment-870422 Chris N. Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:07:17 +0000 44150f0008b0ca4b2f2f4b3b06b59d8d#comment-870422 <p>Can't wait for the mixtape.</p> Can’t wait for the mixtape.

]]> By: kicking222 http://idolator.com/5161164/the-beatles-new-revolution/comment-page-1#comment-870432 kicking222 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:50:55 +0000 44150f0008b0ca4b2f2f4b3b06b59d8d#comment-870432 <p>Uh... damn. A Beatles leak? That's amazing and ridiculous. As far as the track itself, well, it's great. It's The Fucking Beatles. It's incredibly interesting to hear a different take (no pun intended) on such a classic track (and it's slightly less classic experimental version).</p> Uh… damn. A Beatles leak? That’s amazing and ridiculous. As far as the track itself, well, it’s great. It’s The Fucking Beatles. It’s incredibly interesting to hear a different take (no pun intended) on such a classic track (and it’s slightly less classic experimental version).

]]>