<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear Journalists: Please Use This Definition Of &#8220;The Radiohead Model&#8221; Going Forward</title>
	<atom:link href="http://idolator.com/5162743/dear-journalists-please-use-this-definition-of-the-radiohead-model-going-forward/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idolator.com/5162743/dear-journalists-please-use-this-definition-of-the-radiohead-model-going-forward</link>
	<description>Music News, Reviews, and Gossip on Idolator.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 22:32:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: elvissinatra</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5162743/dear-journalists-please-use-this-definition-of-the-radiohead-model-going-forward/comment-page-1#comment-872262</link>
		<dc:creator>elvissinatra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 07:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://712d1d0a8c1ceb9f989e38f880f825be#comment-872262</guid>
		<description>&lt;P&gt;One tiny, technical thing: &quot;In Rainbows&#039; VBR was just under the OiNK standard of 192Kbps...&quot;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Substitute &quot;bitrate&quot; for &quot;VBR.&quot; VBR stands for &quot;variable bitrate&quot; while In Rainbows was encoded at a constant bitrate (CBR) of 160kbps.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One tiny, technical thing: &#8220;In Rainbows&#8217; VBR was just under the OiNK standard of 192Kbps&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Substitute &#8220;bitrate&#8221; for &#8220;VBR.&#8221; VBR stands for &#8220;variable bitrate&#8221; while In Rainbows was encoded at a constant bitrate (CBR) of 160kbps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5162743/dear-journalists-please-use-this-definition-of-the-radiohead-model-going-forward/comment-page-1#comment-872272</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 04:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://712d1d0a8c1ceb9f989e38f880f825be#comment-872272</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As to who started the multi-tiered album, you can look back to the former standard of Standard Release vs. Deluxe Edition (which usually featured a bonus DVD or bonus tracks for some extra change).  The first album I can think of is Deftones&#039; White Pony from 2000. The limited red edition featured an extra track, &quot;Boys Republic.&quot;  But my memory and knowledge are limited, so I&#039;d expect there to be an earlier example of the limited/deluxe release.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But when it comes to the more recent trend, which features a digital release, vinyl, deluxe, CD, and other permutations, I give all credit to Trent Reznor, even though Radiohead technically beat him to the punch.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As to who started the multi-tiered album, you can look back to the former standard of Standard Release vs. Deluxe Edition (which usually featured a bonus DVD or bonus tracks for some extra change).  The first album I can think of is Deftones&#8217; White Pony from 2000. The limited red edition featured an extra track, &#8220;Boys Republic.&#8221;  But my memory and knowledge are limited, so I&#8217;d expect there to be an earlier example of the limited/deluxe release.</p>
<p>But when it comes to the more recent trend, which features a digital release, vinyl, deluxe, CD, and other permutations, I give all credit to Trent Reznor, even though Radiohead technically beat him to the punch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maura Johnston</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5162743/dear-journalists-please-use-this-definition-of-the-radiohead-model-going-forward/comment-page-1#comment-872282</link>
		<dc:creator>Maura Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 10:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://712d1d0a8c1ceb9f989e38f880f825be#comment-872282</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@&lt;a href=&quot;#c11089686&quot;&gt;Rock You Like An Iracane&lt;/a&gt;: :)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11089686">Rock You Like An Iracane</a>: :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rock You Like An Iracane</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5162743/dear-journalists-please-use-this-definition-of-the-radiohead-model-going-forward/comment-page-1#comment-872292</link>
		<dc:creator>Rock You Like An Iracane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://712d1d0a8c1ceb9f989e38f880f825be#comment-872292</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;For the record, Maura, I still like it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, Maura, I still like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maura Johnston</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5162743/dear-journalists-please-use-this-definition-of-the-radiohead-model-going-forward/comment-page-1#comment-872302</link>
		<dc:creator>Maura Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 07:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://712d1d0a8c1ceb9f989e38f880f825be#comment-872302</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@&lt;a href=&quot;#c11084248&quot;&gt;Chris Molanphy&lt;/a&gt;: but the thing is, the week of the download release was when the whole &#039;btw the mp3s are low-quality&#039; thing came out, too. you&#039;d think that would have been a bigger deal?&lt;br&gt;
also i left the part about the model pretty much not being replicable because few bands have radiohead&#039;s press muscle. oops. time for revision 1!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11084248">Chris Molanphy</a>: but the thing is, the week of the download release was when the whole &#8216;btw the mp3s are low-quality&#8217; thing came out, too. you&#8217;d think that would have been a bigger deal?<br />
also i left the part about the model pretty much not being replicable because few bands have radiohead&#8217;s press muscle. oops. time for revision 1!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Molanphy</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5162743/dear-journalists-please-use-this-definition-of-the-radiohead-model-going-forward/comment-page-1#comment-872312</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Molanphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 07:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://712d1d0a8c1ceb9f989e38f880f825be#comment-872312</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with your definition -- especially if we take as given the fact that Radiohead knew they&#039;d do a regular retail release (by which I mean a $15ish CD, not the deluxe vinyl thing) within months. However, we need to be fair about why reporters missed that retail part.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I suspect part of the reason the &quot;Radiohead Model&quot; definition got hard-coded incorrectly was that RH didn&#039;t talk about the regular release at all until (if I recall) the week of the download release or just thereafter. So journalists all took note of Stage I of the release, the pay-what-you-will/all-electronic bit, and they had tuned out when the normal CD was announced and released. Any reporter whose beat is business or technology and not arts is going to lose interest in this story after the unusual digital release, when they&#039;re on to the next story and already have &quot;Radiohead Model&quot; etched in their heads.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your definition &#8212; especially if we take as given the fact that Radiohead knew they&#8217;d do a regular retail release (by which I mean a $15ish CD, not the deluxe vinyl thing) within months. However, we need to be fair about why reporters missed that retail part.</p>
<p>I suspect part of the reason the &#8220;Radiohead Model&#8221; definition got hard-coded incorrectly was that RH didn&#8217;t talk about the regular release at all until (if I recall) the week of the download release or just thereafter. So journalists all took note of Stage I of the release, the pay-what-you-will/all-electronic bit, and they had tuned out when the normal CD was announced and released. Any reporter whose beat is business or technology and not arts is going to lose interest in this story after the unusual digital release, when they&#8217;re on to the next story and already have &#8220;Radiohead Model&#8221; etched in their heads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sicksteanein</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5162743/dear-journalists-please-use-this-definition-of-the-radiohead-model-going-forward/comment-page-1#comment-872322</link>
		<dc:creator>sicksteanein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 05:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://712d1d0a8c1ceb9f989e38f880f825be#comment-872322</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@&lt;a href=&quot;#c11081389&quot;&gt;Jerkwheat&lt;/a&gt;: Smashing Pumpkins I think.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11081389">Jerkwheat</a>: Smashing Pumpkins I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerkwheat</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5162743/dear-journalists-please-use-this-definition-of-the-radiohead-model-going-forward/comment-page-1#comment-872332</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerkwheat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 05:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://712d1d0a8c1ceb9f989e38f880f825be#comment-872332</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Is there any particular band we can blame for the &quot;releasing five different packages of an album - each with its own particular bonus tracks, booklets, dvd, special collector&#039;s item breakfast cereal, etc&quot; model of doing things?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any particular band we can blame for the &#8220;releasing five different packages of an album &#8211; each with its own particular bonus tracks, booklets, dvd, special collector&#8217;s item breakfast cereal, etc&#8221; model of doing things?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerkwheat</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5162743/dear-journalists-please-use-this-definition-of-the-radiohead-model-going-forward/comment-page-1#comment-872342</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerkwheat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 05:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://712d1d0a8c1ceb9f989e38f880f825be#comment-872342</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Is there any parti</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any parti</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
