<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Blender&#8221;: A Look Back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back</link>
	<description>Music News, Reviews, and Gossip on Idolator.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:30:15 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: evo-forum</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-1192471</link>
		<dc:creator>evo-forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 05:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-1192471</guid>
		<description>The major recession that began in 2008 has had a profound effect on the auto industry, and even insurance companies have paid a heavy price for the downturn. While legitimate insurance claims have shrunken a bit since fewer jobs mean fewer motorists on the road, the National Insurance Crime Bureau (NICB) claims that fraudulent claims from staged accidents jumped 46 percent from 2007 to 2009.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The major recession that began in 2008 has had a profound effect on the auto industry, and even insurance companies have paid a heavy price for the downturn. While legitimate insurance claims have shrunken a bit since fewer jobs mean fewer motorists on the road, the National Insurance Crime Bureau (NICB) claims that fraudulent claims from staged accidents jumped 46 percent from 2007 to 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juancho</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-881702</link>
		<dc:creator>Juancho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 01:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-881702</guid>
		<description>&lt;P&gt;I&#039;m going to miss this magazine quite a bit.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I remember the first time I saw it back in &#039;02, not only was it a cousin of Maxim that seemed to be of quality, at the time they had a pretty decent new book reviews section!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have to agree with Chris, I had a comp subscription and it was one of the few magazines that was always worth reading. In fact, I may have paid for it if I needed to.(The same could not be said of Spin, on both counts.)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And even if you weren&#039;t a fan of scantily clad pop or movie stars, at least the photography was top-notch.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to miss this magazine quite a bit.</p>
<p>I remember the first time I saw it back in &#8216;02, not only was it a cousin of Maxim that seemed to be of quality, at the time they had a pretty decent new book reviews section!</p>
<p>I have to agree with Chris, I had a comp subscription and it was one of the few magazines that was always worth reading. In fact, I may have paid for it if I needed to.(The same could not be said of Spin, on both counts.)</p>
<p>And even if you weren&#8217;t a fan of scantily clad pop or movie stars, at least the photography was top-notch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: natepatrin</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-881712</link>
		<dc:creator>natepatrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 01:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-881712</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@&lt;a href=&quot;#c11703461&quot;&gt;Cam/ron&lt;/a&gt;: Wow, somewhere along the line Rollins turned into Gene Simmons.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11703461">Cam/ron</a>: Wow, somewhere along the line Rollins turned into Gene Simmons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris N.</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-881722</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-881722</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@ Chris Willman: At CW I make do with 105. Although to be honest sometimes it&#039;s difficult to think of even that much to say about some records.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Chris Willman: At CW I make do with 105. Although to be honest sometimes it&#8217;s difficult to think of even that much to say about some records.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rock You Like An Iracane</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-881732</link>
		<dc:creator>Rock You Like An Iracane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-881732</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@&lt;a href=&quot;#c11702911&quot;&gt;saturn&lt;/a&gt;: The exception was that &quot;500 Songs&quot; list, which I thoroughly enjoyed. I never subscribed to Blender (well, until just this year, when I got a free subscription) but I bought a few issues (like that one) on newsstands, and read the blog.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Despite tipping towards typically overblown reviews in its later years (Coldplay&#039;s &lt;i&gt;X&amp;Y&lt;/i&gt; earned five stars, for example), Blender did pop culture and music with a sort of earnest hipster vibe; sure, Arcade Fire are cool and all, Blender said, but so is Lil Wayne. So are Clipse. So are these indie bands that we enjoy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I once told some friends that if I were ever a writer for a music magazine, I wanted it to be Blender. Now I won&#039;t get that opportunity, and, though my feelings aren&#039;t as strong as they were when I first thought that, it makes me a little dusty.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11702911">saturn</a>: The exception was that &#8220;500 Songs&#8221; list, which I thoroughly enjoyed. I never subscribed to Blender (well, until just this year, when I got a free subscription) but I bought a few issues (like that one) on newsstands, and read the blog.</p>
<p>Despite tipping towards typically overblown reviews in its later years (Coldplay&#8217;s <i>X&amp;Y</i> earned five stars, for example), Blender did pop culture and music with a sort of earnest hipster vibe; sure, Arcade Fire are cool and all, Blender said, but so is Lil Wayne. So are Clipse. So are these indie bands that we enjoy.</p>
<p>I once told some friends that if I were ever a writer for a music magazine, I wanted it to be Blender. Now I won&#8217;t get that opportunity, and, though my feelings aren&#8217;t as strong as they were when I first thought that, it makes me a little dusty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weezy F Baby</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-881782</link>
		<dc:creator>Weezy F Baby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 08:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-881782</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;still the only major magazine that&#039;s given me any work. they sent checks out quickly, they paid well, and everyone i encountered there was super nice. RIP.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>still the only major magazine that&#8217;s given me any work. they sent checks out quickly, they paid well, and everyone i encountered there was super nice. RIP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-881742</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 06:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-881742</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I was pretty ambivalent about Blender - seemed like a watered-down version of Q, in some respects - but it wasn&#039;t awful, by any means. Sure, a lot of their lists were of a questionable quality (as such things tend to be), but every once in a while they&#039;d really nail it. And I also appreciated their efforts to cover the lesser known acts, even with Kanye or Ashley Simpson on the cover. The &#039;Download This&#039; section was pretty solid in the early days, too.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One thing I&#039;ll always remember and respect them for - they gave Tom Vek 4 stars.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was pretty ambivalent about Blender &#8211; seemed like a watered-down version of Q, in some respects &#8211; but it wasn&#8217;t awful, by any means. Sure, a lot of their lists were of a questionable quality (as such things tend to be), but every once in a while they&#8217;d really nail it. And I also appreciated their efforts to cover the lesser known acts, even with Kanye or Ashley Simpson on the cover. The &#8216;Download This&#8217; section was pretty solid in the early days, too.</p>
<p>One thing I&#8217;ll always remember and respect them for &#8211; they gave Tom Vek 4 stars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cam/ron</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-881752</link>
		<dc:creator>Cam/ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 04:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-881752</guid>
		<description>&lt;P&gt;Don&#039;t forget the online cartoon of Henry Rollins bragging about his money and sexual experience while trashing Blender for listing him as one of rock&#039;s worst songwriters.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href=&quot;http://www.blender.com/features/henry_rollins/index.html&quot;&gt;[www.blender.com]&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget the online cartoon of Henry Rollins bragging about his money and sexual experience while trashing Blender for listing him as one of rock&#8217;s worst songwriters.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.blender.com/features/henry_rollins/index.html">[www.blender.com]</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saturn</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-881762</link>
		<dc:creator>saturn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 02:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-881762</guid>
		<description>&lt;P&gt;@&lt;A href=&quot;http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back#c11688275&quot;&gt;Dan Gibson&lt;/A&gt;: This reminds me of something else I liked about Blender. most of the time, they published their top X lists in descending order, to that you&#039;d have to read the whole article to get to number 1. So many magazines start with 1, which takes all the fun out of it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back#c11688275">Dan Gibson</a>: This reminds me of something else I liked about Blender. most of the time, they published their top X lists in descending order, to that you&#8217;d have to read the whole article to get to number 1. So many magazines start with 1, which takes all the fun out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Molanphy</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-881772</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Molanphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 01:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-881772</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@&lt;a href=&quot;#c11688275&quot;&gt;Dan Gibson&lt;/a&gt;: Thank you for covering me on that! I&#039;ve been mostly offline since posting my comment and missed the requests for the list.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;@&lt;a href=&quot;#c11691128&quot;&gt;Poubelle&lt;/a&gt;: It&#039;s a blast to play start-to-finish, and it&#039;s actually a carefully curated list -- you can quibble with lots of the individual choices but not the totality of it. (There are songs I like better by the Cars and the Cure, among others.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What really makes it work is its small-C catholic definition of what &quot;new wave&quot; is. The &lt;i&gt;Blender&lt;/i&gt; guys understand how that term morphed to absorb all manner of post-punk mini-genres, from &quot;stylistically wandering punk&quot; to &quot;economical guitar rock&quot; to &quot;minimalist synth-pop.&quot; And it manages to throw in post-2000 songs that don&#039;t feel like pandering at all. Seriously, I play this thing every other month or so.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11688275">Dan Gibson</a>: Thank you for covering me on that! I&#8217;ve been mostly offline since posting my comment and missed the requests for the list.</p>
<p>@<a href="#c11691128">Poubelle</a>: It&#8217;s a blast to play start-to-finish, and it&#8217;s actually a carefully curated list &#8212; you can quibble with lots of the individual choices but not the totality of it. (There are songs I like better by the Cars and the Cure, among others.)</p>
<p>What really makes it work is its small-C catholic definition of what &#8220;new wave&#8221; is. The <i>Blender</i> guys understand how that term morphed to absorb all manner of post-punk mini-genres, from &#8220;stylistically wandering punk&#8221; to &#8220;economical guitar rock&#8221; to &#8220;minimalist synth-pop.&#8221; And it manages to throw in post-2000 songs that don&#8217;t feel like pandering at all. Seriously, I play this thing every other month or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
