<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Blender&#8221;: A Look Back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back</link>
	<description>Music News, Reviews, and Gossip on Idolator.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 22:32:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: evo-forum</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-1192471</link>
		<dc:creator>evo-forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 05:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-1192471</guid>
		<description>The major recession that began in 2008 has had a profound effect on the auto industry, and even insurance companies have paid a heavy price for the downturn. While legitimate insurance claims have shrunken a bit since fewer jobs mean fewer motorists on the road, the National Insurance Crime Bureau (NICB) claims that fraudulent claims from staged accidents jumped 46 percent from 2007 to 2009.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The major recession that began in 2008 has had a profound effect on the auto industry, and even insurance companies have paid a heavy price for the downturn. While legitimate insurance claims have shrunken a bit since fewer jobs mean fewer motorists on the road, the National Insurance Crime Bureau (NICB) claims that fraudulent claims from staged accidents jumped 46 percent from 2007 to 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juancho</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-881702</link>
		<dc:creator>Juancho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 01:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-881702</guid>
		<description>&lt;P&gt;I&#039;m going to miss this magazine quite a bit.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I remember the first time I saw it back in &#039;02, not only was it a cousin of Maxim that seemed to be of quality, at the time they had a pretty decent new book reviews section!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have to agree with Chris, I had a comp subscription and it was one of the few magazines that was always worth reading. In fact, I may have paid for it if I needed to.(The same could not be said of Spin, on both counts.)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And even if you weren&#039;t a fan of scantily clad pop or movie stars, at least the photography was top-notch.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to miss this magazine quite a bit.</p>
<p>I remember the first time I saw it back in &#8217;02, not only was it a cousin of Maxim that seemed to be of quality, at the time they had a pretty decent new book reviews section!</p>
<p>I have to agree with Chris, I had a comp subscription and it was one of the few magazines that was always worth reading. In fact, I may have paid for it if I needed to.(The same could not be said of Spin, on both counts.)</p>
<p>And even if you weren&#8217;t a fan of scantily clad pop or movie stars, at least the photography was top-notch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: natepatrin</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-881712</link>
		<dc:creator>natepatrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 01:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-881712</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@&lt;a href=&quot;#c11703461&quot;&gt;Cam/ron&lt;/a&gt;: Wow, somewhere along the line Rollins turned into Gene Simmons.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11703461">Cam/ron</a>: Wow, somewhere along the line Rollins turned into Gene Simmons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris N.</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-881722</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-881722</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@ Chris Willman: At CW I make do with 105. Although to be honest sometimes it&#039;s difficult to think of even that much to say about some records.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Chris Willman: At CW I make do with 105. Although to be honest sometimes it&#8217;s difficult to think of even that much to say about some records.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rock You Like An Iracane</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-881732</link>
		<dc:creator>Rock You Like An Iracane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-881732</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@&lt;a href=&quot;#c11702911&quot;&gt;saturn&lt;/a&gt;: The exception was that &quot;500 Songs&quot; list, which I thoroughly enjoyed. I never subscribed to Blender (well, until just this year, when I got a free subscription) but I bought a few issues (like that one) on newsstands, and read the blog.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Despite tipping towards typically overblown reviews in its later years (Coldplay&#039;s &lt;i&gt;X&amp;Y&lt;/i&gt; earned five stars, for example), Blender did pop culture and music with a sort of earnest hipster vibe; sure, Arcade Fire are cool and all, Blender said, but so is Lil Wayne. So are Clipse. So are these indie bands that we enjoy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I once told some friends that if I were ever a writer for a music magazine, I wanted it to be Blender. Now I won&#039;t get that opportunity, and, though my feelings aren&#039;t as strong as they were when I first thought that, it makes me a little dusty.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11702911">saturn</a>: The exception was that &#8220;500 Songs&#8221; list, which I thoroughly enjoyed. I never subscribed to Blender (well, until just this year, when I got a free subscription) but I bought a few issues (like that one) on newsstands, and read the blog.</p>
<p>Despite tipping towards typically overblown reviews in its later years (Coldplay&#8217;s <i>X&amp;Y</i> earned five stars, for example), Blender did pop culture and music with a sort of earnest hipster vibe; sure, Arcade Fire are cool and all, Blender said, but so is Lil Wayne. So are Clipse. So are these indie bands that we enjoy.</p>
<p>I once told some friends that if I were ever a writer for a music magazine, I wanted it to be Blender. Now I won&#8217;t get that opportunity, and, though my feelings aren&#8217;t as strong as they were when I first thought that, it makes me a little dusty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weezy F Baby</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-881782</link>
		<dc:creator>Weezy F Baby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 08:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-881782</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;still the only major magazine that&#039;s given me any work. they sent checks out quickly, they paid well, and everyone i encountered there was super nice. RIP.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>still the only major magazine that&#8217;s given me any work. they sent checks out quickly, they paid well, and everyone i encountered there was super nice. RIP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-881742</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 06:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-881742</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I was pretty ambivalent about Blender - seemed like a watered-down version of Q, in some respects - but it wasn&#039;t awful, by any means. Sure, a lot of their lists were of a questionable quality (as such things tend to be), but every once in a while they&#039;d really nail it. And I also appreciated their efforts to cover the lesser known acts, even with Kanye or Ashley Simpson on the cover. The &#039;Download This&#039; section was pretty solid in the early days, too.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One thing I&#039;ll always remember and respect them for - they gave Tom Vek 4 stars.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was pretty ambivalent about Blender &#8211; seemed like a watered-down version of Q, in some respects &#8211; but it wasn&#8217;t awful, by any means. Sure, a lot of their lists were of a questionable quality (as such things tend to be), but every once in a while they&#8217;d really nail it. And I also appreciated their efforts to cover the lesser known acts, even with Kanye or Ashley Simpson on the cover. The &#8216;Download This&#8217; section was pretty solid in the early days, too.</p>
<p>One thing I&#8217;ll always remember and respect them for &#8211; they gave Tom Vek 4 stars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cam/ron</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-881752</link>
		<dc:creator>Cam/ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 04:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-881752</guid>
		<description>&lt;P&gt;Don&#039;t forget the online cartoon of Henry Rollins bragging about his money and sexual experience while trashing Blender for listing him as one of rock&#039;s worst songwriters.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href=&quot;http://www.blender.com/features/henry_rollins/index.html&quot;&gt;[www.blender.com]&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget the online cartoon of Henry Rollins bragging about his money and sexual experience while trashing Blender for listing him as one of rock&#8217;s worst songwriters.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.blender.com/features/henry_rollins/index.html">[www.blender.com]</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saturn</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-881762</link>
		<dc:creator>saturn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 02:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-881762</guid>
		<description>&lt;P&gt;@&lt;A href=&quot;http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back#c11688275&quot;&gt;Dan Gibson&lt;/A&gt;: This reminds me of something else I liked about Blender. most of the time, they published their top X lists in descending order, to that you&#039;d have to read the whole article to get to number 1. So many magazines start with 1, which takes all the fun out of it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back#c11688275">Dan Gibson</a>: This reminds me of something else I liked about Blender. most of the time, they published their top X lists in descending order, to that you&#8217;d have to read the whole article to get to number 1. So many magazines start with 1, which takes all the fun out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Molanphy</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-881772</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Molanphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 01:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-881772</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@&lt;a href=&quot;#c11688275&quot;&gt;Dan Gibson&lt;/a&gt;: Thank you for covering me on that! I&#039;ve been mostly offline since posting my comment and missed the requests for the list.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;@&lt;a href=&quot;#c11691128&quot;&gt;Poubelle&lt;/a&gt;: It&#039;s a blast to play start-to-finish, and it&#039;s actually a carefully curated list -- you can quibble with lots of the individual choices but not the totality of it. (There are songs I like better by the Cars and the Cure, among others.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What really makes it work is its small-C catholic definition of what &quot;new wave&quot; is. The &lt;i&gt;Blender&lt;/i&gt; guys understand how that term morphed to absorb all manner of post-punk mini-genres, from &quot;stylistically wandering punk&quot; to &quot;economical guitar rock&quot; to &quot;minimalist synth-pop.&quot; And it manages to throw in post-2000 songs that don&#039;t feel like pandering at all. Seriously, I play this thing every other month or so.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11688275">Dan Gibson</a>: Thank you for covering me on that! I&#8217;ve been mostly offline since posting my comment and missed the requests for the list.</p>
<p>@<a href="#c11691128">Poubelle</a>: It&#8217;s a blast to play start-to-finish, and it&#8217;s actually a carefully curated list &#8212; you can quibble with lots of the individual choices but not the totality of it. (There are songs I like better by the Cars and the Cure, among others.)</p>
<p>What really makes it work is its small-C catholic definition of what &#8220;new wave&#8221; is. The <i>Blender</i> guys understand how that term morphed to absorb all manner of post-punk mini-genres, from &#8220;stylistically wandering punk&#8221; to &#8220;economical guitar rock&#8221; to &#8220;minimalist synth-pop.&#8221; And it manages to throw in post-2000 songs that don&#8217;t feel like pandering at all. Seriously, I play this thing every other month or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NotPop</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-881842</link>
		<dc:creator>NotPop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 10:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-881842</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@&lt;a href=&quot;#c11683487&quot;&gt;Chris Molanphy&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Blender - Top 40 New Wave songs.torrent&quot; please&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11683487">Chris Molanphy</a>:</p>
<p>&#8220;Blender &#8211; Top 40 New Wave songs.torrent&#8221; please</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poubelle</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-881792</link>
		<dc:creator>Poubelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-881792</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@&lt;a href=&quot;#c11688275&quot;&gt;Dan Gibson&lt;/a&gt;: Thank you! Damn, that is one incredible list.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11688275">Dan Gibson</a>: Thank you! Damn, that is one incredible list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-881852</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 05:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-881852</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You say 130 words like that&#039;s a bad thing! At EW, we were jealous of that hefty a word count for capsules.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say 130 words like that&#8217;s a bad thing! At EW, we were jealous of that hefty a word count for capsules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-881862</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 05:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-881862</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;When the magazine came out it was billed as a sister magazine to &quot;Maxim&quot;. It came across(at first anyway) as the U.S. version of &quot;Mojo&quot; or &quot;Uncut&quot;. I remember in the beginning  some of their album reviews were very amateurish compared to those publications(in particular a scathing review of one of my favorite albums in the last 10 years, &quot;Rival Schools&quot;). Clark Collis makes a good point. Over time the magazine really started to decline and try to pander more to the TRL crowd than real music fans who still read &quot;Mojo&quot; and &quot;Uncut&quot; religiously.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the magazine came out it was billed as a sister magazine to &#8220;Maxim&#8221;. It came across(at first anyway) as the U.S. version of &#8220;Mojo&#8221; or &#8220;Uncut&#8221;. I remember in the beginning  some of their album reviews were very amateurish compared to those publications(in particular a scathing review of one of my favorite albums in the last 10 years, &#8220;Rival Schools&#8221;). Clark Collis makes a good point. Over time the magazine really started to decline and try to pander more to the TRL crowd than real music fans who still read &#8220;Mojo&#8221; and &#8220;Uncut&#8221; religiously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Gibson</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-881802</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Gibson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 04:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-881802</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@&lt;a href=&quot;#c11688003&quot;&gt;Poubelle&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;40 - It&#039;s Still Rock And Roll To Me - Billy Joel&lt;br&gt;
39 - Our Lips Are Sealed - The Go-Go&#039;s&lt;br&gt;
38 - Making Plans For Nigel - XTC&lt;br&gt;
37 - I Ran - A Flock Of Seagulls&lt;br&gt;
36 - White Lines - Grandmaster Flash&lt;br&gt;
35 - Radio Free Europe - REM&lt;br&gt;
34 - Rebel Yell - Billy Idol&lt;br&gt;
33 - I Will Follow - U2&lt;br&gt;
32 - Take On Me - A-HA&lt;br&gt;
31 - Tainted Love - Soft Cell&lt;br&gt;
30 - Never Say Never - Romeo Void&lt;br&gt;
29 - Mirror In The Bathroom - The English Beat&lt;br&gt;
28 - Blister In The Sun - Violent Femmes&lt;br&gt;
27 - Bizarre Love Triangle - New Order&lt;br&gt;
26 - Let&#039;s Go To Bed - The Cure&lt;br&gt;
25 - Burning Up - Madonna&lt;br&gt;
24 - Satisfaction - Devo&lt;br&gt;
23 - Take Me Out - Franz Ferdinand&lt;br&gt;
22 - Debaser - The Pixies&lt;br&gt;
21 - Warm Leatherette - The Normal&lt;br&gt;
20 - Pop Musik - M&lt;br&gt;
19 - I Found That Essence Rare - Gang Of Four&lt;br&gt;
18 - Pump It Up - Elvis Costello&lt;br&gt;
17 - Enola Gay - OMD&lt;br&gt;
16 - House Of Jealous Lovers - The Rapture&lt;br&gt;
15 - One Way Or Another - Blondie&lt;br&gt;
14 - The Look Of Love - ABC&lt;br&gt;
13 - Roadrunner - The Modern Lovers&lt;br&gt;
12 - This Charming Man - The Smiths&lt;br&gt;
11 - Life During Wartime - The Talking Heads&lt;br&gt;
10 - Just Can&#039;t Get Enough - Depeche Mode&lt;br&gt;
9 - Good Times Roll - The Cars&lt;br&gt;
8 - Opportunities - Pet Shop Boys&lt;br&gt;
7 - Pretty In Pink - Psychedelic Furs&lt;br&gt;
6 - Hungry Like The Wolf - Duran Duran&lt;br&gt;
5 - Love Will Tear Us Apart - Joy Division&lt;br&gt;
4 - Don&#039;t You Want Me - Human League&lt;br&gt;
3 - When You Were Mine - Prince&lt;br&gt;
2 - 52 Girls - B-52&#039;s&lt;br&gt;
1 - Cars - Gary Numan&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11688003">Poubelle</a>:</p>
<p>40 &#8211; It&#8217;s Still Rock And Roll To Me &#8211; Billy Joel<br />
39 &#8211; Our Lips Are Sealed &#8211; The Go-Go&#8217;s<br />
38 &#8211; Making Plans For Nigel &#8211; XTC<br />
37 &#8211; I Ran &#8211; A Flock Of Seagulls<br />
36 &#8211; White Lines &#8211; Grandmaster Flash<br />
35 &#8211; Radio Free Europe &#8211; REM<br />
34 &#8211; Rebel Yell &#8211; Billy Idol<br />
33 &#8211; I Will Follow &#8211; U2<br />
32 &#8211; Take On Me &#8211; A-HA<br />
31 &#8211; Tainted Love &#8211; Soft Cell<br />
30 &#8211; Never Say Never &#8211; Romeo Void<br />
29 &#8211; Mirror In The Bathroom &#8211; The English Beat<br />
28 &#8211; Blister In The Sun &#8211; Violent Femmes<br />
27 &#8211; Bizarre Love Triangle &#8211; New Order<br />
26 &#8211; Let&#8217;s Go To Bed &#8211; The Cure<br />
25 &#8211; Burning Up &#8211; Madonna<br />
24 &#8211; Satisfaction &#8211; Devo<br />
23 &#8211; Take Me Out &#8211; Franz Ferdinand<br />
22 &#8211; Debaser &#8211; The Pixies<br />
21 &#8211; Warm Leatherette &#8211; The Normal<br />
20 &#8211; Pop Musik &#8211; M<br />
19 &#8211; I Found That Essence Rare &#8211; Gang Of Four<br />
18 &#8211; Pump It Up &#8211; Elvis Costello<br />
17 &#8211; Enola Gay &#8211; OMD<br />
16 &#8211; House Of Jealous Lovers &#8211; The Rapture<br />
15 &#8211; One Way Or Another &#8211; Blondie<br />
14 &#8211; The Look Of Love &#8211; ABC<br />
13 &#8211; Roadrunner &#8211; The Modern Lovers<br />
12 &#8211; This Charming Man &#8211; The Smiths<br />
11 &#8211; Life During Wartime &#8211; The Talking Heads<br />
10 &#8211; Just Can&#8217;t Get Enough &#8211; Depeche Mode<br />
9 &#8211; Good Times Roll &#8211; The Cars<br />
8 &#8211; Opportunities &#8211; Pet Shop Boys<br />
7 &#8211; Pretty In Pink &#8211; Psychedelic Furs<br />
6 &#8211; Hungry Like The Wolf &#8211; Duran Duran<br />
5 &#8211; Love Will Tear Us Apart &#8211; Joy Division<br />
4 &#8211; Don&#8217;t You Want Me &#8211; Human League<br />
3 &#8211; When You Were Mine &#8211; Prince<br />
2 &#8211; 52 Girls &#8211; B-52&#8242;s<br />
1 &#8211; Cars &#8211; Gary Numan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poubelle</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-881812</link>
		<dc:creator>Poubelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 04:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-881812</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@&lt;a href=&quot;#c11683487&quot;&gt;Chris Molanphy&lt;/a&gt;: I don&#039;t need a torrent, but neither Blender&#039;s site search nor Google is turning up this magical list for me--where can I find it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I wasn&#039;t the hugest fan of Blender (and based on most of their covers, not exactly their target audience, which hey, could&#039;ve been part of their problem), but they&#039;d usually have an interesting article or two, and some decent reviews. I suppose I should feel guiltier for all the times I flipped through a copy and put it back on the rack, but honestly, I didn&#039;t like it &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; much. (I did think that time when both they and Rolling Stone had Britney cover stories at the exact same time, theirs was miles better.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m more sad to see Blender go in a general &quot;sucks for the print industry/music writing&quot; way than for any particular attachment to it. (Not that I helped, outside of maybe giving their website a few more hits now and then.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If Spin goes, though, I&#039;ll be one unhappy camper.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11683487">Chris Molanphy</a>: I don&#8217;t need a torrent, but neither Blender&#8217;s site search nor Google is turning up this magical list for me&#8211;where can I find it?</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t the hugest fan of Blender (and based on most of their covers, not exactly their target audience, which hey, could&#8217;ve been part of their problem), but they&#8217;d usually have an interesting article or two, and some decent reviews. I suppose I should feel guiltier for all the times I flipped through a copy and put it back on the rack, but honestly, I didn&#8217;t like it <i>that</i> much. (I did think that time when both they and Rolling Stone had Britney cover stories at the exact same time, theirs was miles better.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m more sad to see Blender go in a general &#8220;sucks for the print industry/music writing&#8221; way than for any particular attachment to it. (Not that I helped, outside of maybe giving their website a few more hits now and then.)</p>
<p>If Spin goes, though, I&#8217;ll be one unhappy camper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doublewhiskycokenoice</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-881872</link>
		<dc:creator>doublewhiskycokenoice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 03:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-881872</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i don&#039;t know what depresses me more:  rolling stone switching to an architectural digest-size style, fader becoming pseudo-mainstream, or blender dying.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i need some feel good music.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a name=&quot;youtube:RFwTdrhPUr8&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t know what depresses me more:  rolling stone switching to an architectural digest-size style, fader becoming pseudo-mainstream, or blender dying.</p>
<p>i need some feel good music.<br />
<a name="youtube:RFwTdrhPUr8"></a></p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Molanphy</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-881882</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Molanphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 03:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-881882</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I never got to write for &lt;i&gt;Blender&lt;/i&gt;, but I really will miss the niche it filled. It was one of the few physical magazines that, when it showed up in the mail (I still subscribe to all the big ones), I&#039;d actually &lt;i&gt;read&lt;/i&gt; it rather than allowing it to pile up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I guess I&#039;d sum up &lt;i&gt;Blender&lt;/i&gt; this way: In the post-sellout era of the &#039;00s, it did sellout &lt;b&gt;right&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not just the skin-baring covers (about a third of the time, the interview with said starlet would actually be worth reading). I mean, they did lists in an era where every music magazine has lists -- but theirs were actually interesting. About three years ago, they did this great list of &quot;Top 40 New Wave songs,&quot; and it was so clever and all-encompassing (it started with Billy Joel...seriously...and ended with Gary Numan, with everyone from Jonathan Richman to Franz Ferdinand in-between) that I duplicated it on my iPod and have been playing it regularly ever since.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was like a bunch of smart people had decided to hold hands and jump into the commercial end of the pool together, and what they created was surprisingly worthwhile. R.I.P.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never got to write for <i>Blender</i>, but I really will miss the niche it filled. It was one of the few physical magazines that, when it showed up in the mail (I still subscribe to all the big ones), I&#8217;d actually <i>read</i> it rather than allowing it to pile up.</p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;d sum up <i>Blender</i> this way: In the post-sellout era of the &#8217;00s, it did sellout <b>right</b>.</p>
<p>Not just the skin-baring covers (about a third of the time, the interview with said starlet would actually be worth reading). I mean, they did lists in an era where every music magazine has lists &#8212; but theirs were actually interesting. About three years ago, they did this great list of &#8220;Top 40 New Wave songs,&#8221; and it was so clever and all-encompassing (it started with Billy Joel&#8230;seriously&#8230;and ended with Gary Numan, with everyone from Jonathan Richman to Franz Ferdinand in-between) that I duplicated it on my iPod and have been playing it regularly ever since.</p>
<p>It was like a bunch of smart people had decided to hold hands and jump into the commercial end of the pool together, and what they created was surprisingly worthwhile. R.I.P.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-881822</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 02:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-881822</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;IDK, they&#039;re kinda known for out of context quotes, and complaints from artists. I think Fall Out Boy was the last to get spun by them? My point is, as great as it was, you guys are really selling it in the comments. Why did no one emerge with all this glory-rain before?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IDK, they&#8217;re kinda known for out of context quotes, and complaints from artists. I think Fall Out Boy was the last to get spun by them? My point is, as great as it was, you guys are really selling it in the comments. Why did no one emerge with all this glory-rain before?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DocStrange</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5187628/blender-a-look-back/comment-page-1#comment-881832</link>
		<dc:creator>DocStrange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 02:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://957cd038255b07b1d1ed0bda7041fd49#comment-881832</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I remember that 500 Best Songs Since You Were Born Feature. I had (as I mentioned) a 6 month free trial subscription I got from somewhere and noticed that Bassment Jaxx&#039;s &quot;Where&#039;s Your Head At&quot; was listed twice (once pretty high and again rather low) and apparently was the only person to spot this because its still on their website.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They were an OK magazine. It sucks that alot of good magazines are dying. I remember a magazine called Giant that&#039;s entire jist was that it was like Maxim but written by pop-culture obsessed eggheads. Then it was bought out and some guy who used to edit &quot;Source&quot; became the editor, fired the staff and turned it into a hip-hop magazine. That was only the first of my heartbreaks with magazines. And now more and more of the magazines I love are dying.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember that 500 Best Songs Since You Were Born Feature. I had (as I mentioned) a 6 month free trial subscription I got from somewhere and noticed that Bassment Jaxx&#8217;s &#8220;Where&#8217;s Your Head At&#8221; was listed twice (once pretty high and again rather low) and apparently was the only person to spot this because its still on their website.</p>
<p>They were an OK magazine. It sucks that alot of good magazines are dying. I remember a magazine called Giant that&#8217;s entire jist was that it was like Maxim but written by pop-culture obsessed eggheads. Then it was bought out and some guy who used to edit &#8220;Source&#8221; became the editor, fired the staff and turned it into a hip-hop magazine. That was only the first of my heartbreaks with magazines. And now more and more of the magazines I love are dying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
