Leonard Cohen Revises “Hallelujah” Into A Love Song

If you were Leonard Cohen, and you kept hearing how no one considers your version of “Hallelujah” to be the best one—and, trust me, most people do not—you might be tempted, on your new tour, to change the song’s arrangement a bit. Make it a little more like that dead pretty boy, with chiming guitar, or more like the viola guy from that Warhol band, a little peppier and piano-driven. But did he?



Well, sort of. Cohen doesn’t borrow anything instrumentally, as the arrangement is basically the same organ-heavy vibe as heard on Cohen Live. That album’s “Hallelujah,” taken from a mid-’80s tour, was notably different from the studio version, as it began with three new verses before finishing with the fourth verse of the original. Cale would combine the two versions to produce the five-verse arrangement that Buckley used, and which most people are familiar with.

At first, it seems like Cohen is going to capitulate and embrace the sad-sack miserabilism that Buckley’s revision embodied. The first four verses are, indeed, the same as in Cale’s arrangement, but the closing verse is different. Where Cale closed with a harrowing verse with the climactic line “It’s a cold and it’s a broken Hallelujah,” Cohen instead interjects the verse he used to finish off both of his previous versions. That verse concludes with:

And even though
It all went wrong
I’ll stand before the Lord of Song
With nothing on my tongue but Hallelujah

In Cale’s version, the hope of ecstasy promised by the sensual fourth verse (”remember when I moved in you”) is ultimately crushed by the hopelessness present in most of the other verses. But here, that verse is followed with the above affirmation of triumph. When Cohen used this verse to close his previous live version, it came after utter dejection, and so represented a kind of hope in the face of hopelessness. Now it finds itself transformed into a statement about love. This arrangement says that love is imperfect, but nevertheless works, somehow, and can achieve a kind of transcendent, irrational bliss if you give it time. Where Cohen’s studio version was youthful Biblical cleverness and his ’80s live version was midlife despair, in his old age—and with that wonderful voice—he instead affirms love, in spite of it all.

I’m no hardcore Cohen fan, so I don’t know how long he’s been using this version. But it for sure tops that worn-out old stub of a banality that is the Buckley version. As, regrettably, Watchmen realized. Ah well, you can’t win ‘em all.

Leonard Cohen, ‘Hallelujah’ — Video Premiere [Spinner]

 
Hallelujah: Leonard Cohen vs Jeff Buckley
Hallelujah: Leonard Cohen vs Jeff Buckley
Jeff Buckley - Hallelujah - popavenue - Happy French Pop Blog
Leonard Cohen goes spiritual on 'Old Ideas'
Throughout his 45-year career, Leonard Cohen has often juggled love ... he’s the man who wrote “Hallelujah,” which became immortalized by the late Jeff Buckley. But this album seems to provide more weighted spiritual balance.
Leonard Cohen has some new "Old Ideas"- Hallelujah!
LOS ANGELES (TheWrap.com) - Leonard Cohen sold off his song rights some years ... ultimately spurred the recording of "Old Ideas," his first studio album in eight years. As Jeff Buckley, Jason Castro, Lee DeWyze, Rufus Wainwright, Bon Jovi ...



 
  1. ConfidoBoyd  |   Posted on Mar 30th, 2009

    Seems like there are plenty of more eloquent ways you can praise Cohen without shitting all over Buckley.

  2. Anonymous  |   Posted on Mar 30th, 2009

    @ConfidoBoyd: Yet, it’s so much more fun that way…

  3. Ned Raggett  |   Posted on Mar 30th, 2009

    @2goldfish: For ‘fun’ you mean ‘accurate,’ surely. (Yes I am full of hate, for I am simple.)

  4. SkyHits  |   Posted on Mar 30th, 2009

    This is incredibly great, that is all.

  5. Mike Barthel  |   Posted on Mar 31st, 2009

    @MhS: he’s talked about it a few times and has been nothing but gracious, as you would expect from Leonard Cohen. When whatshisface (Damien Rice?) played essentially the Buckley version for Cohen’s induction into the RnR HoF, Cohen teared up and blew kisses, so there you go.

  6. Anonymous  |   Posted on Mar 30th, 2009

    I’m kind of against the Buckley backlash. His “Hallelujah” really only suffers from overexposure. If you could erase the 412,000 times you’ve heard it and go back to the first listening, it’s still a revelatory and beautiful thing. And then everybody shat on it by putting in every TV show and movie ever. It’s rock foie gras – we’re choking on the thing. It just needs a break.

    That said, I loves me the Leonard Cohen and I adore his “Lord of Song” verse.

  7. Mike Barthel  |   Posted on Mar 30th, 2009

    @aristoxenus: I always hated that stupid song. I may be the only person in my generation who never bought Grace, although I have now somehow acquired two copies, because, like dogs, they can smell fear.

    Also, having aired my anti-Buckley viewpoint in many different venues now, trust me, it’s a pretty small backlash.

  8. Anonymous  |   Posted on Mar 30th, 2009

    Is Mr Cohen on record with his opinion of the various versions of this song?

  9. KinetiQ  |   Posted on Mar 30th, 2009

    Various Positions is such a great album.

  10. Tommy  |   Posted on Jul 18th, 2010

    Leonard Cohen, as I understand it, has written over a hundred verses of this particular song.
    I have many of his CDs — and when I get tired of the same-ol’ same-ol’ of the vast majority of music that is published, he is such a relief providing depth and multiple dimensions to his listeners. He is such a poet and one of the absolute best in his musical arrangements.

Leave a Reply

Sign In Login