<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Everybody Be Cool: Pitchfork Still Hearts Radiohead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://idolator.com/5267332/everybody-be-cool-pitchfork-still-hearts-radiohead/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idolator.com/5267332/everybody-be-cool-pitchfork-still-hearts-radiohead</link>
	<description>Music News, Reviews, and Gossip on Idolator.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:56:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: eulogy grandmother</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5267332/everybody-be-cool-pitchfork-still-hearts-radiohead/comment-page-1#comment-1101461</link>
		<dc:creator>eulogy grandmother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 01:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idolator.com/?p=5267332#comment-1101461</guid>
		<description>Good day, You publish some great blogs, I adore nearly all of your current posts. I always check back here often to see in case you have kept up to date. Continue blogging!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good day, You publish some great blogs, I adore nearly all of your current posts. I always check back here often to see in case you have kept up to date. Continue blogging!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sparkletone</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5267332/everybody-be-cool-pitchfork-still-hearts-radiohead/comment-page-1#comment-969792</link>
		<dc:creator>sparkletone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idolator.com/?p=5267332#comment-969792</guid>
		<description>No, no! I&#039;ve been misunderstood. DiCrescenzo&#039;s initial Kid A review IS obnoxiously written! However, compared to the ... highlights? ... of his time at Pitchfork, it doesn&#039;t rate with the truly weird and awful ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, no! I&#8217;ve been misunderstood. DiCrescenzo&#8217;s initial Kid A review IS obnoxiously written! However, compared to the &#8230; highlights? &#8230; of his time at Pitchfork, it doesn&#8217;t rate with the truly weird and awful ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moulty</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5267332/everybody-be-cool-pitchfork-still-hearts-radiohead/comment-page-1#comment-969602</link>
		<dc:creator>moulty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idolator.com/?p=5267332#comment-969602</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-969522&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bruno the Fishing Dog&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;i&gt;the new Crystal Wolvvvz EP&lt;/i&gt;

Haha that&#039;s great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-969522" rel="nofollow">Bruno the Fishing Dog</a>: <i>the new Crystal Wolvvvz EP</i></p>
<p>Haha that&#8217;s great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k-rex</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5267332/everybody-be-cool-pitchfork-still-hearts-radiohead/comment-page-1#comment-969532</link>
		<dc:creator>k-rex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idolator.com/?p=5267332#comment-969532</guid>
		<description>&quot;everything from production to arrangements to lyrics to album art were carefully crafted towards a unified purpose”
This is why Radiohead, by way of their superfans, are so annoying. There is a huge, huge chasm between &quot;carefully crafted&quot; and &quot;lots of cool sounding overdubs and studio wankery&quot;. And Kid A is where Radiohead jumped straight from the one to the other. Sometimes (always?) random stuff thrown together is just random.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;everything from production to arrangements to lyrics to album art were carefully crafted towards a unified purpose”<br />
This is why Radiohead, by way of their superfans, are so annoying. There is a huge, huge chasm between &#8220;carefully crafted&#8221; and &#8220;lots of cool sounding overdubs and studio wankery&#8221;. And Kid A is where Radiohead jumped straight from the one to the other. Sometimes (always?) random stuff thrown together is just random.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruno the Fishing Dog</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5267332/everybody-be-cool-pitchfork-still-hearts-radiohead/comment-page-1#comment-969522</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruno the Fishing Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idolator.com/?p=5267332#comment-969522</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-969452&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;iantenna&lt;/a&gt;: i kind of like what they&#039;re doing with that. there&#039;s an icon that differentiates it from an actual new release, and then it goes in the separate section on the front page for reissues.

it used to be that some reissues would get 9s and 10s and then fall through the cracks while the new Crystal Wolvvvz EP or whatever sits on the front page for the world to see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-969452" rel="nofollow">iantenna</a>: i kind of like what they&#8217;re doing with that. there&#8217;s an icon that differentiates it from an actual new release, and then it goes in the separate section on the front page for reissues.</p>
<p>it used to be that some reissues would get 9s and 10s and then fall through the cracks while the new Crystal Wolvvvz EP or whatever sits on the front page for the world to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saturn</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5267332/everybody-be-cool-pitchfork-still-hearts-radiohead/comment-page-1#comment-969502</link>
		<dc:creator>saturn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idolator.com/?p=5267332#comment-969502</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-969482&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ChrisB.&lt;/a&gt;: that was the best retraction ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-969482" rel="nofollow">ChrisB.</a>: that was the best retraction ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: krisskraft</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5267332/everybody-be-cool-pitchfork-still-hearts-radiohead/comment-page-1#comment-969492</link>
		<dc:creator>krisskraft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idolator.com/?p=5267332#comment-969492</guid>
		<description>Kid A and Amnesiac are both great. They could have released them together as a double album and there would have been no suffering in quality or importance.

It&#039;s a shame that the band since hasn&#039;t done much for which to sing praises. Come on, admit it, the best thing that can be said about &quot;In Rainbows&quot; is that it&#039;s the band&#039;s fifth best album. 

And a bit off subject, but I wish Pfork would just stop complaining about Radiohead&#039;s treatment by Capitol. The label allowed them full creative control to become the most influential and (arguably) greatest band of their generation; they helped land the band&#039;s records debut at number one on billboard; they promoted in interesting ways that were respectful to their art; they basically financed the groundwork for the cottage industry that Radiohead will now rely on for the rest of their lives. I don&#039;t know if I&#039;ve actually heard Radiohead complain about Capitol, but Pfork needs to shut the fuck up about it. Their constant complaining sounds like your run-of-the-mill 90&#039;s indie-kid bellyaching to me. 

And if it comes down to the fact that Capitol released a box set of the albums and a &quot;Best of&quot;, then I have to advise the writers over there to grow up. Worsts offenses have been committed to the legacy of a band. Further to the point though, Capitol owns those records and can do whatever they want with them. Radiohead signed a contract, and I&#039;m sure Capitol&#039;s ownership of the masters were explicitly laid out in it. Anyway, I&#039;m sure the band still sees a nice royalty rate from those sales too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kid A and Amnesiac are both great. They could have released them together as a double album and there would have been no suffering in quality or importance.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame that the band since hasn&#8217;t done much for which to sing praises. Come on, admit it, the best thing that can be said about &#8220;In Rainbows&#8221; is that it&#8217;s the band&#8217;s fifth best album. </p>
<p>And a bit off subject, but I wish Pfork would just stop complaining about Radiohead&#8217;s treatment by Capitol. The label allowed them full creative control to become the most influential and (arguably) greatest band of their generation; they helped land the band&#8217;s records debut at number one on billboard; they promoted in interesting ways that were respectful to their art; they basically financed the groundwork for the cottage industry that Radiohead will now rely on for the rest of their lives. I don&#8217;t know if I&#8217;ve actually heard Radiohead complain about Capitol, but Pfork needs to shut the fuck up about it. Their constant complaining sounds like your run-of-the-mill 90&#8217;s indie-kid bellyaching to me. </p>
<p>And if it comes down to the fact that Capitol released a box set of the albums and a &#8220;Best of&#8221;, then I have to advise the writers over there to grow up. Worsts offenses have been committed to the legacy of a band. Further to the point though, Capitol owns those records and can do whatever they want with them. Radiohead signed a contract, and I&#8217;m sure Capitol&#8217;s ownership of the masters were explicitly laid out in it. Anyway, I&#8217;m sure the band still sees a nice royalty rate from those sales too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisB.</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5267332/everybody-be-cool-pitchfork-still-hearts-radiohead/comment-page-1#comment-969482</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisB.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idolator.com/?p=5267332#comment-969482</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-969462&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ScrabbleChamp&lt;/a&gt;: It was less obnoxious because DiCrescenzo wasn&#039;t writing about a phony trek across Europe looking for &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.netphoria.org/music-board-archive/62132-pitchfork-retracts-beasties-review.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a misplaced Radiohead show&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-969462" rel="nofollow">ScrabbleChamp</a>: It was less obnoxious because DiCrescenzo wasn&#8217;t writing about a phony trek across Europe looking for <a href="http://forums.netphoria.org/music-board-archive/62132-pitchfork-retracts-beasties-review.html" rel="nofollow">a misplaced Radiohead show</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slowburn</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5267332/everybody-be-cool-pitchfork-still-hearts-radiohead/comment-page-1#comment-969472</link>
		<dc:creator>slowburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idolator.com/?p=5267332#comment-969472</guid>
		<description>Incredible album. I had to put it away for a few years (I just didn&#039;t want to feel that in-my-head for a brief period in my life) and when I came back to it it was such an extraordinary homecoming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incredible album. I had to put it away for a few years (I just didn&#8217;t want to feel that in-my-head for a brief period in my life) and when I came back to it it was such an extraordinary homecoming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScrabbleChamp</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5267332/everybody-be-cool-pitchfork-still-hearts-radiohead/comment-page-1#comment-969462</link>
		<dc:creator>ScrabbleChamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idolator.com/?p=5267332#comment-969462</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-969432&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sparkletone&lt;/a&gt;: 

Sorry, what part of this isn&#039;t obnoxious?:

&quot;The butterscotch lamps along the walls of the tight city square bled upward into the cobalt sky, which seemed as strikingly artificial and perfect as a wizard&#039;s cap. The staccato piano chords ascended repeatedly. &quot;Black eyed angels swam at me,&quot; Yorke sang like his dying words. &quot;There was nothing to fear, nothing to hide.&quot; The trained critical part of me marked the similarity to Coltrane&#039;s &quot;Ole.&quot; The human part of me wept in awe.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-969432" rel="nofollow">sparkletone</a>: </p>
<p>Sorry, what part of this isn&#8217;t obnoxious?:</p>
<p>&#8220;The butterscotch lamps along the walls of the tight city square bled upward into the cobalt sky, which seemed as strikingly artificial and perfect as a wizard&#8217;s cap. The staccato piano chords ascended repeatedly. &#8220;Black eyed angels swam at me,&#8221; Yorke sang like his dying words. &#8220;There was nothing to fear, nothing to hide.&#8221; The trained critical part of me marked the similarity to Coltrane&#8217;s &#8220;Ole.&#8221; The human part of me wept in awe.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
