<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: </title>
	<atom:link href="http://idolator.com/5286562/5286562/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idolator.com/5286562/5286562</link>
	<description>Music News, Reviews, and Gossip on Idolator.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 01:59:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sicksteanein</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5286562/5286562/comment-page-1#comment-990862</link>
		<dc:creator>sicksteanein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idolator.com/?p=5286562#comment-990862</guid>
		<description>The giant assumption that this was made to constrict the borders of what is cool seem like a cop out to justify the rating.

Also, I discovered some bands from the Romeo and Juliet soundtrack when I was a kid. I&#039;m glad there wasn&#039;t a web site around to tell me how uncool I was to like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The giant assumption that this was made to constrict the borders of what is cool seem like a cop out to justify the rating.</p>
<p>Also, I discovered some bands from the Romeo and Juliet soundtrack when I was a kid. I&#8217;m glad there wasn&#8217;t a web site around to tell me how uncool I was to like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KingofPants</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5286562/5286562/comment-page-1#comment-990772</link>
		<dc:creator>KingofPants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idolator.com/?p=5286562#comment-990772</guid>
		<description>The author of the review is either totally having Pitchfork on or is stunningly unaware of the publication he writes for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The author of the review is either totally having Pitchfork on or is stunningly unaware of the publication he writes for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: solanine</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5286562/5286562/comment-page-1#comment-990732</link>
		<dc:creator>solanine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idolator.com/?p=5286562#comment-990732</guid>
		<description>&quot;...the same restless disregard for boundaries that indie listeners-- ideally, at least-- aspire toward.&quot;

bwa ha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;the same restless disregard for boundaries that indie listeners&#8211; ideally, at least&#8211; aspire toward.&#8221;</p>
<p>bwa ha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drunkwithpower</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5286562/5286562/comment-page-1#comment-990722</link>
		<dc:creator>drunkwithpower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idolator.com/?p=5286562#comment-990722</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-990642&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nicolars&lt;/a&gt;: That&#039;s why it&#039;s so funny, if they hadn&#039;t reviewed it at all then the ommission would have been really obvious since they&#039;ve been reporting on it for months.  A good review would have pissed off their core fanbase and a bad review would eliminate any remaining shred of integrity that they still have since most of the performers fit the pitchfork &quot;brand&quot; perfectly and they&#039;d be admitting that they&#039;re basing the review solely on the Twilight image and not on the music.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-990642" rel="nofollow">Nicolars</a>: That&#8217;s why it&#8217;s so funny, if they hadn&#8217;t reviewed it at all then the ommission would have been really obvious since they&#8217;ve been reporting on it for months.  A good review would have pissed off their core fanbase and a bad review would eliminate any remaining shred of integrity that they still have since most of the performers fit the pitchfork &#8220;brand&#8221; perfectly and they&#8217;d be admitting that they&#8217;re basing the review solely on the Twilight image and not on the music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sicksteanein</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5286562/5286562/comment-page-1#comment-990692</link>
		<dc:creator>sicksteanein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idolator.com/?p=5286562#comment-990692</guid>
		<description>This is exactly how they used to grade the OC soundtracks. No surprise there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is exactly how they used to grade the OC soundtracks. No surprise there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolars</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5286562/5286562/comment-page-1#comment-990642</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idolator.com/?p=5286562#comment-990642</guid>
		<description>Even it was a good soundtrack I doubt Pitchfork would have given it a good review -- the Twilight franchise is everything their target audience despises.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even it was a good soundtrack I doubt Pitchfork would have given it a good review &#8212; the Twilight franchise is everything their target audience despises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drunkwithpower</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5286562/5286562/comment-page-1#comment-990542</link>
		<dc:creator>drunkwithpower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idolator.com/?p=5286562#comment-990542</guid>
		<description>That commentor was me.  I think I&#039;ve seen edgier criticism in People Magazine than in this pitchfork review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That commentor was me.  I think I&#8217;ve seen edgier criticism in People Magazine than in this pitchfork review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
