<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Paste&#8221; Makes A Very Tasteful Illinoise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://idolator.com/5288742/paste-makes-a-very-tasteful-illinoise/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idolator.com/5288742/paste-makes-a-very-tasteful-illinoise</link>
	<description>Music News, Reviews, and Gossip on Idolator.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:57:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thierry</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5288742/paste-makes-a-very-tasteful-illinoise/comment-page-1#comment-994752</link>
		<dc:creator>Thierry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idolator.com/?p=5288742#comment-994752</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-994572&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chachwitablog&lt;/a&gt;: A bit of both, but if I were them I would err on the side of consistency. I think that ultimately it should be considered a 2004 release - sure, much of it was composed in 1967, but the final track order and the actual recordings date from 2004. In the end it&#039;s not unlike someone re-recording old previously unreleased tracks and calling it a new album (as Neil Young has been known to do) - the one difference here is that we&#039;re very familiar with the backstory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-994572" rel="nofollow">chachwitablog</a>: A bit of both, but if I were them I would err on the side of consistency. I think that ultimately it should be considered a 2004 release &#8211; sure, much of it was composed in 1967, but the final track order and the actual recordings date from 2004. In the end it&#8217;s not unlike someone re-recording old previously unreleased tracks and calling it a new album (as Neil Young has been known to do) &#8211; the one difference here is that we&#8217;re very familiar with the backstory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chachwitablog</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5288742/paste-makes-a-very-tasteful-illinoise/comment-page-1#comment-994572</link>
		<dc:creator>chachwitablog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idolator.com/?p=5288742#comment-994572</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-994512&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;whoneedslight&lt;/a&gt;: Agreed. But You Forgot It In People really, really should have made the cut too. (It is in my top 5 of the decade.)

Thierry: Infuriating that it is being excluded now, or infuriating that it was wrongly included on those lists before? I&#039;m honestly not sure where it belongs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-994512" rel="nofollow">whoneedslight</a>: Agreed. But You Forgot It In People really, really should have made the cut too. (It is in my top 5 of the decade.)</p>
<p>Thierry: Infuriating that it is being excluded now, or infuriating that it was wrongly included on those lists before? I&#8217;m honestly not sure where it belongs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thierry</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5288742/paste-makes-a-very-tasteful-illinoise/comment-page-1#comment-994522</link>
		<dc:creator>Thierry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 05:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idolator.com/?p=5288742#comment-994522</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m finding the revisionist exclusion of Brian Wilson&#039;s Smile (which everyone reviewed as a new release in &#039;04 and included in that year&#039;s top new releases) from all of these Top of the &#039;00s kind of infuriating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m finding the revisionist exclusion of Brian Wilson&#8217;s Smile (which everyone reviewed as a new release in &#8216;04 and included in that year&#8217;s top new releases) from all of these Top of the &#8217;00s kind of infuriating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whoneedslight</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5288742/paste-makes-a-very-tasteful-illinoise/comment-page-1#comment-994512</link>
		<dc:creator>whoneedslight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 02:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idolator.com/?p=5288742#comment-994512</guid>
		<description>I think The Moon and Antarctica should have made the cut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think The Moon and Antarctica should have made the cut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas Jensen</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5288742/paste-makes-a-very-tasteful-illinoise/comment-page-1#comment-994452</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idolator.com/?p=5288742#comment-994452</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-994262&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;iantenna&lt;/a&gt;: The other Feathers, from Miami, is pretty rad.  They sound like Stereolab and Can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-994262" rel="nofollow">iantenna</a>: The other Feathers, from Miami, is pretty rad.  They sound like Stereolab and Can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fre2daa</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5288742/paste-makes-a-very-tasteful-illinoise/comment-page-1#comment-994302</link>
		<dc:creator>fre2daa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idolator.com/?p=5288742#comment-994302</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m psyched about Vespertine being included, even though it being No. 50. It&#039;s my favorite record.

Other thoughts:

- It&#039;s weird seeing Coldplay in these sorts of lists. A rush... is my favorite record of theirs, though.
- Kala is so much better than Arular.
- Damien Rice, more like NO.
- Some people are right: KID A is going-to-bed music. But incredibly beautiful and complex and crazy going-to-bed music. It deserves the praise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m psyched about Vespertine being included, even though it being No. 50. It&#8217;s my favorite record.</p>
<p>Other thoughts:</p>
<p>- It&#8217;s weird seeing Coldplay in these sorts of lists. A rush&#8230; is my favorite record of theirs, though.<br />
- Kala is so much better than Arular.<br />
- Damien Rice, more like NO.<br />
- Some people are right: KID A is going-to-bed music. But incredibly beautiful and complex and crazy going-to-bed music. It deserves the praise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iantenna</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5288742/paste-makes-a-very-tasteful-illinoise/comment-page-1#comment-994262</link>
		<dc:creator>iantenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idolator.com/?p=5288742#comment-994262</guid>
		<description>devendra and joanna are oddly missing and i know paste must have been huge supporters of that shit in the first half plus of this decade. yes, most of the shit connected to the freak-folk scene SUCKED (i&#039;m looking at you feathers and espers and entrance and like a million others) but devendra and joanna haven&#039;t made a bad album yet. and, for better or worse, that shit defined a huge portion of this decade. there&#039;s no need to pretend it didn&#039;t exist just cause you regret giving a positive review to some 3rd tiered nu-folk bullshit 4 years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>devendra and joanna are oddly missing and i know paste must have been huge supporters of that shit in the first half plus of this decade. yes, most of the shit connected to the freak-folk scene SUCKED (i&#8217;m looking at you feathers and espers and entrance and like a million others) but devendra and joanna haven&#8217;t made a bad album yet. and, for better or worse, that shit defined a huge portion of this decade. there&#8217;s no need to pretend it didn&#8217;t exist just cause you regret giving a positive review to some 3rd tiered nu-folk bullshit 4 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iantenna</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5288742/paste-makes-a-very-tasteful-illinoise/comment-page-1#comment-994182</link>
		<dc:creator>iantenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idolator.com/?p=5288742#comment-994182</guid>
		<description>gentleman jesse is such a bizarre leftfield choice. totally mediocre rip on costello/joe jackson/nick lowe, even down to the &lt;i&gt;this year&#039;s model&lt;/i&gt; cover ape-ing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gentleman jesse is such a bizarre leftfield choice. totally mediocre rip on costello/joe jackson/nick lowe, even down to the <i>this year&#8217;s model</i> cover ape-ing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas Jensen</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5288742/paste-makes-a-very-tasteful-illinoise/comment-page-1#comment-994152</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idolator.com/?p=5288742#comment-994152</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-994092&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;BradNelson&lt;/a&gt;: I&#039;m with you on this, and I so don&#039;t like stuff like that very much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-994092" rel="nofollow">BradNelson</a>: I&#8217;m with you on this, and I so don&#8217;t like stuff like that very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bcapirigi</title>
		<link>http://idolator.com/5288742/paste-makes-a-very-tasteful-illinoise/comment-page-1#comment-994132</link>
		<dc:creator>bcapirigi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idolator.com/?p=5288742#comment-994132</guid>
		<description>Even Paste only put two women in their top 10.  Paste, the magazine that might as well have had Aimee Mann on the cover of every issue from 99-04.

I was actually fine with the list up to #21.  Control, Sound of Silver, Night Falls Over Kortedala and Vespertine are all really good, and I liked Up The Bracket enough that I&#039;m glad it&#039;s on there.  But the top 20 is not so good, is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even Paste only put two women in their top 10.  Paste, the magazine that might as well have had Aimee Mann on the cover of every issue from 99-04.</p>
<p>I was actually fine with the list up to #21.  Control, Sound of Silver, Night Falls Over Kortedala and Vespertine are all really good, and I liked Up The Bracket enough that I&#8217;m glad it&#8217;s on there.  But the top 20 is not so good, is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
