Posts Tagged ‘Steve Jobs’

iTunes Store To Remove DRM, Futz Around With Pricing: Do You Care?

One piece of MacWorld-related big news that doesn’t involve Steve Jobs’ health: The iTunes Store is apparently going to embrace the idea of dynamic pricing (no more 99-cents-per-song standard) and ditch digital-rights management in the near future. According to Peter Kafka, the pricing for songs will be tiered between 79 cents, 99 cents, and $1.29. No word on whether Amazon’s practice of engaging in loss-leading deep discounts will be copied by iTunes, although the price-slashing they’ve engaged in up to this point, and the fact that unlike Amazon they’re not trying to take marketshare away from an already-established competitor, would make me think that not many $1.99 albums are in the offing. But hey, I’m ready to be surprised! MORE »

@revmatty: Exactly. This is what's gotten lost in a lot of the coverage. That and the fact that Steve Jobs went from Record Industry Savior in 2003 to Record Industry Pariah in 2004-05 in record time.

MORE »


Oh, Techwriterpaws

jobslego.jpgIt’s always so cute when tech types get in a lather about one of their pet causes–here, it’s Greg Sandoval at CNet penning an open letter to Steve Jobs begging him to drop DRM on the files in the iTunes Store, which to his mind looks “a little shabby” these days because of Apple’s copy-protection scheme Fairplay–without thinking rationally about why they may be getting a zero instead of a coveted one. (I tried to put the analogy in binary terms so they’d get it.) To wit: MORE »

@Maura Johnston: What Apple did for the music industry was (in large part) save it from a slow, painful demise. They took an old business model and made it more attractive to consumers. And no, Steve Jobs isn't solely the blame for their DRM problems. FWIW, Sandoval has had a pretty timely history of being biased against iPods; whereas most people have a bias FOR iPods. Obviously, he incites a spirited argument.

Most people don't care about DRM, especially since iTunes is The King. But, DRM will be an issue should Apple stop issuing DRM keys, as they've threatened to do in the last month according to a story on this very site. If those servers go away, then the songs won't work. I'm actually shocked that you didn't write an angry post to Apple for threatening to do so.(Though I don't think Apple actually would be so cruel.)

Zune: For what it's worth, Zune has the best music subscription model I've ever heard of. (In addition to their pay-per-track model) If iTunes offered one, then I'd be all over it! It's an example of DRM being used very well - especially now that users can keep 10 songs they download per month even if they cancel their subscription (85-90% of which does NOT have DRM)! Not to mention each subscription can be legally split between 3 devices/3 accounts, so you can end up paying just $5 per month. In fact, I'd argue that Zune is now innovating more that iTunes. Too bad no one here seems to be willing to discuss to that objectively, though. :(

Yes, it IS give and take, as I'm sure you know. But, none of us here should ever assume we know what goes down in those meetings: Not me, you nor Sandoval. It's easy to take sides with a business we love, but it is still a business - and a smart, well-run one at that. (Remember, Apple just got a patent to DRM your iPod to your clothes and labels would prefer a subscription model over Apple's model.) We don't know whose fault it is! Neither is innocent.

[arstechnica.com]
[news.cnet.com]

P.S. I'm too damn long-winded ;)

MORE »


Behold: The Pliesroll, Brought To You By Some Bored Guy On The Internet

This morning while doing my YouTube rounds, I found a clip claiming to have as its audio bed a high-quality version of Kanye West’s Tears For Fears homage “Coldest Winter,” so I–hoping to hear the song without all that peaking and radio static that nearly ruined last week’s leak somewhere around listen No. 10–clicked. But instead of “Coldest Winter, however, we’re treated to a video that fuses together a photo of Steve Jobs holding a pitcher of Kool-Aid, paparazzo shots of The Game and Snoop Dogg, and gunshot sounds in a way that’s seemingly inspired by both Paperrad and ransom notes. MORE »

Part prankster, part Plies fan, part "person with way too much time on their hands," ChangeStyle feels like he can only communicate with the YouTube community by freaking/faking them out.

Please excuse his hands.

MORE »


The Big Apple Announcement: They’re No. 1!

Since I couldn’t make it up to San Francisco to see whatever Steve Jobs wants to dole out to his music-listening public in person (mostly because I wasn’t invited), here’s an open thread in which we can comment on the revelations let loose by Steve Jobs at today’s “Apple: Let’s Rock” event. MORE »

@Chris Molanphy: He needs to go the Radiohead route and charge people for the info leak.

MORE »


Hey, Let’s Write a Song Called “Steve Jobs Is Dreamy”


Ed. note: Chris “dennisobell” Molanphy, our resident chart guru, looks at the upward, downward, and lack of movement on this week’s Billboard charts:

“Is this Feist again?” my friends asked at the Super Bowl party I attended last Sunday, as Apple’s latest product-porn ad popped onto the plasma.

“No, no,” I said, confidently. “Apple doesn’t re-use acts in these ads. I think this is Regina Spektor.”

Oops.

I pride myself on being able to nail a song in one or two listens, but I think I can be forgiven for botching that call. The fact is, no one in America had heard of Yael Naïm before her perky, warbly “New Soul” became the soundtrack to the first MacBook Air commercial. But that’s all changed, now that “New Soul” is the top-selling song on iTunes. In fact, in her first week on the Hot 100, the indie-label-backed Israeli native pulls off something that took Feist about a month: Reaching the chart’s Top 10. MORE »

The modern rock tracks are worse than the country tracks.

MORE »


Steve Jobs Not Subscribing To Labels’ iTunes Demands

jobslego.jpgNegotiations between iTunes and the four major labels are looming, and there’s been a fair amount of talk about the majors’ desire to shift iTunes to a subscription model similar to Napster, Urge, and other also-ran music-selling sites. But yesterday, Jobs told a reporter that he was pretty lukewarm on the idea–and he even used the f-word while doing so:

“Never say never, but customers don’t seem to be interested in it,” Jobs told Reuters in an interview after Apple reported blow-out quarterly results. “The subscription model has failed so far.”

MORE »

Jeez-next the record companies will want to put a tax on blank cassettes...

MORE »


Behind The Scenes At The iTunes Store: It’s About As Nerdy As You’d Imagine

jobslegoooo.jpgToday’s Wall Street Journal looks at what it takes for artists to get some lovin’ from the iTunes store. It’s a lengthy piece, so here’s our quick cheat sheet: MORE »

Actually, the cyborg bees aren't made for taking over the world, but are instead part of Apple's upcoming iBumble portable honey system, which Steven Jobs has said will "revolutionize the honey industry by putting the means of honey production in the hands of the proletariat."

MORE »


Steve Jobs’ Music-Industry Rant Might Be Winning Hearts, Minds Of Record Execs

When Steve Jobs squawks, people listen: Earlier this week, the Apple honcho posted a lengthy missive about the need to make all digital music files unprotected, arguing that the major labels have to make their music as accessible as they can in order to combat piracy (reading the polite-but-firm… MORE »

Risk insurance? What morons! It's like they're worried that once these songs are made available in MP3 there'll be no stopping their unfettered and unauthorized dissemination. Earth to EMI (and everybody else: your music is already available in MP3 format. You only stand to gain from authorizing sales of MP3s as people such as myself who would never buy DRM encoded tracks will start to patronize online music sellers. Sheesh!

MORE »


RIAA Not Willing To Give Up On The DRM Dream

Steve Jobs’ anti-digital rights management screed from earlier this week has elicited a response from the Recording Industry Association of America, who, having already shown off their lousy math skills, are now putting their not-so-great reading comprehension on display: Apple’s offer to license… MORE »

The "open letter" was definitely a semi-veiled threat from Jobs to the labels that they better not jack with the amount he has to pay for songs Apple sells on iTunes. Incredibly self-serving on the part of Jobs, but he IS a corporate head, so what else is to be expected? The RIAA is ALSO a big corporation who is desperately trying to maintain the status quo on their end. The RIAA (and the equally myopic labels) are starting to look more and more like the French plantation family that still sips Bordeaux and sits on chintz sofas half way up the river in "Apocalypse Now" - while Charlie and Hendrix-blaring narco-Marines fill in the landscape around them.

Not even Dennis Hopper cares if music video directors get their cut.

MORE »


New Apple Deal Will Allow Steve Jobs And Paul McCartney To Finally Make A Few Bucks

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Apple (the company in charge of the Beatles’ catalog) and Apple (the computer company that can’t seem to make a decent battery) have settled their trademark dispute: Under a new deal that replaces one reached in 1991, Apple will own… MORE »

Wild guesses:

1. Cash. Jobs likely paid a hefty sum to acquire the trademark, and I'd bet that Apple Corps is receiving a paid-up, royalty-free license to use the APPLE marks worldwide for as long as it cares to continue pressing records. The quality-control aspects of the license should be pretty minimal under the circumstances.

2. Cash. Aside from the Beatles releases from 1968-70, the Apple Corps catalog isn't much to look at commercially, barring a Badfinger revival by "yacht rock" aficionados. (Rubber Soul is from 1965 and therefore not part of the Apple Corps catalog.) To the extent that Ringo Starr and Neil Aspinall want to embark on new projects, or Sir Paul wants to pay for a certain high-profile divorce, this deal should represent a huge shot in the arm.

3. Cash. By settling the dispute once and for all, Apple Corps is saving itself from future fruitless attempts to convince the world that it holds exclusive rights in the APPLE name for music-related products and services. Without the settlement and sale/license, Apple Corps would have to continue litigating to preserve its dwindling trademark rights. Since Apple Corps had effectively lost its trademark in the court of public opinion, this outcome just synchronizes law and reality for a change.

MORE »