<![CDATA[Idolator: the new model, Radiohead]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/idolator.com.png <![CDATA[Idolator: the new model, Radiohead]]> http://idolator.com/tag/the new model/radiohead http://idolator.com/tag/the new model/radiohead <![CDATA[Radiohead Already Over The Whole Free Download Thing]]> AP060617032911.jpgThe "pay what you want" online release of In Rainbows may have set Trent Reznor and Billy Corgan off to discover their own maverick ways, but it looks like Thom Yorke is a little tired of the brave new world. "I think it was a one-off response to a particular situation," said Yorke. Rather than admit that he's loving the taste of Dave Matthews' crunchy granola over at ATO, or that financially the online release of In Rainbows wasn't all that it could have been, he's crediting his anomie on the lack of "significance" it would have if they did it again. It's always about significance with you, isn't it, Thom?




"It was one of those things where we were in the position of everyone asking us what we were going to do," he said. "I don't think it would have the same significance now anyway, if we chose to give something away again. It was a moment in time."



Speaking as Radiohead was promoting its pro-social initiative with MTV against sex- and labor trafficking, Yorke said successful bands have new ways to communicate directly with fans.



"We are about that direct relationship (now) because we are big enough to establish that," he said.

The band has a new video for "All I Need," which was produced jointly with MTV Europe for its anti-human-trafficking MTV Exit campaign. According to Thom, it's all "about exploiting a situation while you have the chance." In more ways than one, dude.

Thom Yorke: Radiohead's stunt was 'one-off' [Hollywood Reporter]

]]>
http://idolator.com/385572/radiohead-already-over-the-whole-free-download-thing http://idolator.com/385572/radiohead-already-over-the-whole-free-download-thing Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:45:00 EDT Anthony Miccio http://idolator.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=385572&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The other night, I was doing a little bit ... ]]> InRainbowsCover.jpgThe other night, I was doing a little bit of last-minute holiday shopping at the soon-to-be-closing Virgin Megastore and I noticed something: Staff members were wearing T-shirts touting Radiohead's In Rainbows, complete with a reminder that the album would be available in the store where I was standing on Jan. 1. Not sure if this t-shirt is only being worn by people who work at the rapidly shrinking chain—and aren't top-down wardrobe edicts an excellent way to keep up employee morale?—but I did find it kind of interesting, if only in an "allegedly forward-thinking band embraces the oldest promotional tactic in the American book (casual Friday edition)" way. Anyone want to bet how high a price one of those shirts would fetch on eBay?

]]>
http://idolator.com/337270/ http://idolator.com/337270/ Mon, 24 Dec 2007 09:15:36 EST mjohnston http://idolator.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=337270&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Courtney Love Ready To Embrace Digital Future (Typing Lessons Not Included)]]> courtney.jpgGene Simmons may not be too pleased with Radiohead's recent digital-distribution experiment, but the still-unsigned-to-a-major Courtney Love is thinking of going the In Rainbows route with her next record. Only she wants to one-up Thom Yorke and the gang by releasing her "A-list material"—and not a bunch of cobbled-together tracks that have been percolating for a while and that got lapped up by the Internet as OMG THE GREATEST THING EVER anyway—on her own terms, and not just as a "promotional stunt for the CD," and after she does Oprah.

as for radiohead= they didcnt jump off a REAL clifff, they bungee jumped you KNOW the kamikaze pilot in me wnats to do the same dfamm thing excapt wuith my a lsit mnaterial, with the real thing- theyve made 9.7 m,illion in 3 weeks this way and its live junk-= not junk as radioheaddoesnt really amke JUNK but its live - most of it heard before( wich youve all heard liveversaionbs of things veryvery different than non live versions of things) i really think it couldf work do all my magazine covers in january - so the lead time in there kamikaze thropugh my junket my oprah my tv shit n the 2 week leaD UP and just jump of f that cliff i love doing things really first im greatful for radiohead for making the first move- id do it differentlyt -= thats why b sides are no longer b sisdes but have to be a sides to an extent-= cos theyre EXTRA TRACKS now wich can mean up to 500k to such and such sponsor coty./my space etc. ... i justthinjk offering about 10 songs but your best for "free" witha what am i worth sign not just NINs cast offs i mean yopur a sides- i don t know im percolating- i love risk and most everything ive ever done well has been because everyone said iw as crazy to do it-= thazts why words liek "risk management" and Rime management:" are4 resonating with me now.

Not that I know what "rime management" is, but hey, I'd kick Courtney some money for a self-financed album. Especially now that she's trying to fashion herself as the Suze Orman of the rocker-chick set, as evidenced by the title of the post where she floats her Radiohead idea:

Fica/Radiohead [Courtney Love's MySpace Blog]

]]>
http://idolator.com/tunes/the-new-model/courtney-love-ready-to-embrace-digital-future-typing-lessons-not-included-323403.php http://idolator.com/tunes/the-new-model/courtney-love-ready-to-embrace-digital-future-typing-lessons-not-included-323403.php Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:05:52 EST mjohnston http://idolator.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=323403&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Radiohead Fans: You Didn't Actually Expect Us To <i>Pay</i> For <i>In Rainbows</i>, Did You?]]> Remember last month, in the wake of Radiohead's pay-what-you-will announcement, when every news outlet and blog was polling its readership as to how much they would be willing to plunk down on In Rainbows? And remember when all those Radiohead fans claimed they would be supporting their favorite band in its paradigm-busting endeavor by paying a reasonable amount? Well, it looks like some of them were fibbing.



ComScore, "a leader in measuring the digital world," has apparently kept an eye on just who was paying for In Rainbows and how much they were forking over. The answer? As little as could be squeezed out:

During the first 29 days of October, 1.2 million people worldwide visited the "In Rainbows" site, with a significant percentage of visitors ultimately downloading the album. The study showed that 38 percent of global downloaders of the album willingly paid to do so, with the remaining 62 percent choosing to pay nothing. The percent downloading for free in the U.S. (60 percent) is only marginally lower than in the rest of the world (64 percent).

Everyone who foresaw this development can now give themselves a gold star. Of course, no one has obtained any firm numbers directly from the band or its management just yet—a rainbow-colored grain of salt for the time being—but even if this data pans out and Radiohead's point has been somewhat undermined by their "freeloading" fans, as ComScore's Gian Fulgoni told the Chicago Tribune:

He noted that an e-commerce Web site typically converts about 5 percent of its traffic into sales in a given month. The conversion rate for the Radiohead album will be "substantially higher," he said. "You can see this getting up into the millions of dollars."

See, not a total failure. Champagne for everyone, then.

For Radiohead Fans, Does "Free" + "Download" = "Freeload"? [ComScore]

]]>
http://idolator.com/tunes/the-new-model/radiohead-fans-you-didnt-actually-expect-us-to-pay-for-in-rainbows-did-you-319394.php http://idolator.com/tunes/the-new-model/radiohead-fans-you-didnt-actually-expect-us-to-pay-for-in-rainbows-did-you-319394.php Tue, 06 Nov 2007 11:00:05 EST jharv http://idolator.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=319394&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[In case you want to go crazy and blow your ... ]]> In case you want to go crazy and blow your rent on Radiohead's In Rainbows, be warned: The online order form maxes out at £99.99 ($205.81), as one blogger found out. Oh no, you might have to actually pay for other albums in order to satisfy your shopping jones! [LimeWire Blog]

]]>
http://idolator.com/tunes/price-ceilings/-306333.php http://idolator.com/tunes/price-ceilings/-306333.php Tue, 02 Oct 2007 17:52:14 EDT mjohnston http://idolator.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=306333&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Radiohead To Journalists: You'll Get Your "In Rainbows" MP3s When Everyone Else Does]]> In what I think is a pretty genius/ballsy move—not only for the way it circumvents "leak culture" for a band that's essentially giving away its music for free, but for the way it guarantees even more publicity for an act that really doesn't need it right now—Radiohead has announced (via its PR company, Nasty Little Man) that it won't be sending out advances of In Rainbows prior to its Oct. 10 digital release date:

There will be no advances, promotional copies, digital streams, media sites, etc. of RADIOHEAD's In Rainbows.

Everyone in the world will be getting the music at the same time: Oct. 10. That includes us. We don't have anything to play anyone in the nine days until the record is available. Everyone at nasty has put his or her order in and just to clarify: you are not being asked to pay for a promo (as some have inquired). you can pay nothing or as much or as little as you want.

There will be no promotional copies of the discbox either, as each discbox is being made to order. Sorry.

I'm sure that a bunch of e-mails from frazzled editors/high-on-their-horse bloggers necessitated this response from Nasty, and I'm sure that this response is making some of them climb the walls right now. (Especially the part about no free discboxes. How many "packaging specialists" do you think asked for that as their advance? Talk about chintzy.) Yes, you can argue that bands that don't have the press clout/name recognition that Radiohead do simply can't afford to gamble like this and potentially piss off the people who they want to cover their stuff, but at the same time, you know that there's going to be no way this thing leaks before the band wants it to, even if it is free.

Not to mention that the news that In Rainbows will be coming out as a plain ol' CD next year kind of makes this whole run-up seem like a very, very well-executed advance marketing strategy, one that Kanye West will no doubt be paying homage to when he releases his next album.

Earlier: Hey, did you hear that Radiohead has a new album coming out?

]]>
http://idolator.com/tunes/the-new-model/radiohead-to-journalists-youll-get-your-in-rainbows-mp3s-when-everyone-else-does-305698.php http://idolator.com/tunes/the-new-model/radiohead-to-journalists-youll-get-your-in-rainbows-mp3s-when-everyone-else-does-305698.php Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:25:56 EDT mjohnston http://idolator.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=305698&view=rss&microfeed=true