After much discussion from witnesses regarding the possibility that the R. Kelly sex tape was a computer-generated forgery, it has now come forward that the prosecution gave the defense an exceptionally poor DVD reproduction of the original tape, which was used during its questioning of expert witness Charles Palm. While Palm claims his testimony was based on the original, high-quality tape, defense attorneys claim the jury may believe they were acting in "poor faith" when they used the prosecution's cheap copy during Palm's testimony. No one's currently asking for a mistrial (maybe they're saving this complaint for an appeal), but it's at least clear that the jury will have to be told the reason for the varying quality of the tape they saw, which may further confuse a jury that's already had to put up with some
twisted shit. During deliberation, however, the jury will be given a VCR so they can watch the original sex tape, despite the defense's worry that they might break it or something.
More »
Idolator
A second witness in the R. Kelly trial, private investigator Nick Palladino, has claimed that prosecution witness Lisa Van Allen and her fiance Yul Brown tried to extort money from Kelly in exchange for not testifying. While they're not accused of asking outright for money, Palladino took their repeated references to a potential $300,000 book deal and "wanting to do what's best for their family," as well as requests for Palladino to tell Kelly of their situation, to mean that they wanted cash. Palladino also says he recorded the meeting, so the jury may be allowed to decide for themselves what implications Van Allen and Brown were trying to make. [
