Exciting stories must be trickling in today, because the New York Times seems like it's trying to aggrandize a record label dispute over a song by rapper Gucci Mane—which is being concurrently released by both his new major Atlantic and his old indie imprint Big Cat—into Suge Knight-level drama, teasing you with the promise of "a story that involves an accused killer, allegations of recording-studio espionage and a lyrical tribute to Rick James."
Which it does—Gucci Mane has run afoul of the law; there is indeed loose talk (and little more) that someone fliched the masters for the song "Freaky Gurl"; and the song interpolates "Super Freak"—but mostly I can't quite figure out why Times writer Jeff Leeds would bother intimating that "it may not be wise to take a dispute with Gucci Mane lightly," because "the rapper was charged with murder in connection with the fatal shooting of an aspiring rapper who had ties to Gucci Mane's rival, the star Young Jeezy." Except as a way to bring some of those murderous rappers and their crazy gun violence into what would have otherwise played out as a dry back and forth between label lawyers in a New York courtroom, warranting maybe brief mention on the rap blogs rather than a long, melodramatic Times story with uncomfortable racial/social undertones.
Rapper's Old Label Cries Foul Over A New Version Of His Hit [NYT]









Comments
it wouldn't be a worthy story if they didn't mention the murder charge. why else would a times reader want to read about a rapper unless he was filthy rich or had a murder charge.
there are stereotypes to be protected.
Wow, surprising to see anyone other than Kelefa Sanneh trying to turn some random Southern rap footnote into a big NYT story.
The funny thing about this article is that there totally is a parallel between this story and the Gucci/Jeezy beef that they don't bring up at all: the whole dispute arose when Jeezy guested on "Icy" and it became a hit. Def Jam wanted to buy it for Jeezy's album, but Big Cat wouldn't sell, or set the price higher than they were willing to pay, pretty much the same thing that happened here, evidently.
I like the way they cast aspersions at "a lyrical tribute to Rick James."
Comment on this post
Reply by EmailLogin with your username and password below. Or comment on this post via email.
Forgot your username or password? New User?