And we're back again with the Pick Of The 'Fork, now coming to you twice a month (every time we do this, we need at least a week and a half to recover). Take a look at this week's examples of gonzo Pitchfork writing, and see if you can find the impostor.
pick of the fork









Comments
As much as I'd like to say #3 was not in the 'fork, it's too outlandish to be made up. Deep-fried-and-battered Iommi solos!?!? Jesus that's too good to be true. So I go with #2.
Shocked that this gem from today's RjD2 takedown didn't make it: "Between the quivering harps, weepy mellotrons, and delicate, pixie-dust electronics that litter the album, Rj must think all you need to do to transmogrify into a pop genius is to imagine what the soundtrack to a Zach Braff remake of Wild Style would sound like."
Is "transmogrify" even a real word? I always thought Calvin from Calvin & Hobbes made it up.
I'm going with #2 because the adjectives (darkness & brightness, cheerful, etc.) are a little too conventional for Pitchfork.
For the record, I don't think the writers at the Pit are that bad. There's humour and a sense of irony in their hyperbole, though is not always obvious to their naysayers.
Comment on this post
Reply by EmailLogin with your username and password below. Or comment on this post via email.
Forgot your username or password? New User?