NEW YORK, 9:05 AM, THU JUL 24 | 25 POSTS IN THE LAST 24 HOURS | tips@idolator.com | SUBMIT A TIP | RSS
record labels

Warner Music Group Readies Axe, Inspiring Some To Double-Check Whether Sky Is Falling

wmg.jpgWarner Music Group will allegedly be shedding 400 jobs soon, news that inspired a "state of the union"-type post on Hypebot. The post, which was helpfully subtitled "Is The End Of The Major Label Near?", runs down a few potential reasons as to how the big four got into their current mess:

As another 400 industry pros loose there jobs it's worth remembering that...
* major labels are no longer controlled by people who care about music. They are owned by stockholders who care about profits.
* l abels can no longer control what gets played on the radio. Thanks to Eliot Spitzer and the FCC payola isn't what it use to be.
* with the internet offering unlimited media sources radio no longer has the clout that it used to anyway.
* free file sharing has forever devalued music.
* single songs downloads have killed the album purchase and thus gutted the profits labels saw from them.
* digital delivery is eroding the labels' gatekeeper status in distribution.
* consumers have more diverse competition for their entertainment $'s and time than ever before

All good points, although we'd also add that the actions of the labels against those people who may actually buy records has also driven away consumers. As have out-of-touch executives, and wrongheaded attempts to rectify the digital-market surge, and ... well, you get the point. Whether or not top brass at labels will as well is still up in the air, but the fact that the layoffs will likely hit the rank-and-file, and not the executive suites, makes us think that there's a long way to go.

Warner Music Group To Layoff 400. Is The End Of The Major Label Near? [Hypebot]

4:45 PM on Mon May 7 2007
By mjohnston
1,213 views
10 comments

Comments

  • I hope they get around to remastering those Doors CDs a couple more times before they say "Th-th-that's All, Folks!"

  • the fact is that job cuts are an acceptance wall street tactic for all companies that are underperforming in the stock market. job cutting is fashionable. the music industry is just like any other underperforming sector that is traded on nasdaq or nyse. job cuts will continue as long as the stock "underperforms."

  • Am i the only one who thinks they should just fire the top 10 or 20 executives? Or gee, maybe it would be a good idea to cut back on needless first class flight tickets, endless expense accounts, and stupidly high end stereo gear. No, that would justbe too much to ask.

  • you didn't mention that the company will reportedly hire for digital-related positions (mentioned in the same article). so, to answer hypebot's question (and some of its other overstatements), no, this does mark the end of the record label. also note the other wmg news today, the launch of a production team, and take note to the rumors that wmg will acquire a leading management company. companies are making changes. there will be less recorded music, and we might not want to call them "labels," but they will be relevant for years to come. (yeah, i know, some people will hate them until they drop d.r.m. and allow their music to be traded on P2P.)

    the next three or four years may be painful, and the majors will certainly shed more jobs and will need much more restructuring, but it has to be this way. regaining financial health won't be easy.

    at wmg especially, old media jobs are being replaced by new media jobs. this isn't because of its stock price, although investors should like the kind of news. it shows a commitment, not just talk, to different business and distribution models. (stock is slightly down today, but no official statement was made by wmg.)

    people have been declaring the death of the major label since the first napster in 1999. same with the cd, still by a country mile the dominant recorded music format. it's 2007...when do the statute of limitations on these predictions run out?

  • @coolfer:
    yeah! coolfer! yeah!

    re:
    the next three or four years may be painful, and the majors will certainly shed more jobs and will need much more restructuring

    can we all agree to call music industry job shedding as "bloodletting"?

  • @coolfer:

    It's SO easy to work in the digital era, I doubt they'll be hiring more than 30 people for the digital-related dept. Also, is it me or is hiring an in-house production team for a major label just the worst idea ever? Yes, it worked for indies like Motown in the 60's, but especially as music is criticized for being too generic, why would you want less music recorded but all done by the same people?

  • Come on Idolator, learn the difference between "there" and "their". 3rd graders know that, don't make me brake down an English lesson...

  • also "lose" and "loose", sheesh

  • @DirtyPistol: We don't copyedit cut-and-pasted quotes. (You can tell it's a quote because it's in pink.)

    Signed,
    Late-night sports desker for three and a half years

  • @DirtyPistol: you could have at least spelled "break" right.

Comment on this post

Reply by Email

Login with your username and password below. Or comment on this post via email.