Every week, we round up the all-important, all-summarizing last sentences of the biggest new-music reviews. Today's entry is the Smashing Pumpkins' Zeitgeist, which comes out tomorrow:
- "In the end, it's the one-dimensional approach, not the lack of half the original members, that leaves Smashing Pumpkins Mach II a cardboard cutout of the real thing— not the empty ATM-reunion it could have been, but still a ghost of the old band." [Pitchfork]
- "His whine hasn't mellowed with age, and there are some truly horrible guitar effects, but if you remember the unconsciously naff hilarity of late-period Suede, you will recognise that there's some fun to be had from Zeitgeist, albeit in small quantities." [Guardian]
- "Maybe someday Mr. Corgan will have to reconcile 'It's lonely at the top' with 'I don't want to be alone.' For now he seems dauntless in his belief that self-absorption and social responsibility can coexist, and who knows? He might have his finger on the pulse after all." [NYT]
- "We've been here before, and while it's not bad, they did it better in the past. The zeitgeist has moved on." [Chicago Sun-Times]








Comments
the unconsciously naff hilarity of late-period Suede
Surely the album can't be as off as A New Morning was. (Or can it?)
I really enjoyed the Pitchfork review (first time for everything!). In a wasteland of Sabbath-derivative crap-rock, the Pumpkins wrote songs that were actually, you know, pretty.
Zwan sounded more like the Pumpkins than Zeitgeist does.
I don't hate A New Morning. I AM ashamed to say it, though.
Comment on this post
Reply by EmailLogin with your username and password below. Or comment on this post via email.
Forgot your username or password? New User?