In what I think is a pretty genius/ballsy move—not only for the way it circumvents "leak culture" for a band that's essentially giving away its music for free, but for the way it guarantees even more publicity for an act that really doesn't need it right now—Radiohead has announced (via its PR company, Nasty Little Man) that it won't be sending out advances of In Rainbows prior to its Oct. 10 digital release date:
There will be no advances, promotional copies, digital streams, media sites, etc. of RADIOHEAD's In Rainbows.
Everyone in the world will be getting the music at the same time: Oct. 10. That includes us. We don't have anything to play anyone in the nine days until the record is available. Everyone at nasty has put his or her order in and just to clarify: you are not being asked to pay for a promo (as some have inquired). you can pay nothing or as much or as little as you want.
There will be no promotional copies of the discbox either, as each discbox is being made to order. Sorry.
I'm sure that a bunch of e-mails from frazzled editors/high-on-their-horse bloggers necessitated this response from Nasty, and I'm sure that this response is making some of them climb the walls right now. (Especially the part about no free discboxes. How many "packaging specialists" do you think asked for that as their advance? Talk about chintzy.) Yes, you can argue that bands that don't have the press clout/name recognition that Radiohead do simply can't afford to gamble like this and potentially piss off the people who they want to cover their stuff, but at the same time, you know that there's going to be no way this thing leaks before the band wants it to, even if it is free.
Not to mention that the news that In Rainbows will be coming out as a plain ol' CD next year kind of makes this whole run-up seem like a very, very well-executed advance marketing strategy, one that Kanye West will no doubt be paying homage to when he releases his next album.
Earlier: Hey, did you hear that Radiohead has a new album coming out?



Comments
That's awesome. I'm not even really a fan, but that's awesome. It's always nice to see people fucking around with the stratification of the music business.
on the low (ha), a friend of mine had dinner with nigel godrich recently... and well... there may be a reason why they aren't giving the album to the press in advance.
It took me a couple hours to actually buy the durned thing, but finally got everything to click into place. I had asked if journos would get advance digital copies if they already paid for them, but if anyone was actually ballsy enough to ask for the boxed set, they should just be instantaneously erased from every publicist's mailing list.
@brainchild: ...so Nigel Godrich told your friend that "In Rainbows," a record HE produced, sucks?
Hrm...
@brainchild: they're giving away the album for FREE(ish). Why would they care about bad reviews? They don't need the sales. They've already cemented their legacy.
@Charlie Kerfelds Jetsons Tee:
Yeah, I was wondering why the band would giveaway an entire album. Hopefully, they made their own "Metal Machine Music" that's nothing but guitar feedback and recordings of Thom singing in the shower.
@Cam/ron: now THAT I would buy for $18.99 at Virgin!!
This just gets better and better.
I was joking at lunch that today would be an interesting day at the office for radiohead's PR people.
I was righter than I knew, it looks like.
someone should send crying of lot 49 kanye's way.
So Radiohead doesn't want the press to hear the new album because it's bad... but they didn't mind the entire world hearing the songs when they played most of them on their last tour. Makes perfect sense.
@Charlie Kerfelds Jetsons Tee: the beatles were never too fond of the Let It Be album thanks to Phil Spector, right?
Comment on this post
Reply by EmailLogin with your username and password below. Or comment on this post via email.
Forgot your username or password? New User?