<![CDATA[Jackin' Pop: We Got A Little Crazy With Our Calculators - Idolator Comments]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/idolator.com.png <![CDATA[Jackin' Pop: We Got A Little Crazy With Our Calculators - Idolator Comments]]> http://idolator.com Sun, 07 Jan 2007 01:26:15 EST Sun, 07 Jan 2007 01:26:15 EST http://idolator.com/tunes/jackin.-pop/jackin-pop-we-got-a-little-crazy-with-our-calculators-226516.php <![CDATA[Jackin' Pop: We Got A Little Crazy With Our Calculators]]> http://idolator.com/tunes/jackin.-pop/jackin-pop-we-got-a-little-crazy-with-our-calculators-226516.php#c810705 No, singles are one-vote-one-point. Albums get weighted points.

Michaelangelo Matos

]]> 33:226516:c810705 Sun, 07 Jan 2007 01:26:15 EST <![CDATA[Jackin' Pop: We Got A Little Crazy With Our Calculators]]> http://idolator.com/tunes/jackin.-pop/jackin-pop-we-got-a-little-crazy-with-our-calculators-226516.php#c810530 Can you do this for singles, too?

Hamm Beerger

]]> 33:226516:c810530 Sat, 06 Jan 2007 23:35:56 EST <![CDATA[Jackin' Pop: We Got A Little Crazy With Our Calculators]]> http://idolator.com/tunes/jackin.-pop/jackin-pop-we-got-a-little-crazy-with-our-calculators-226516.php#c808372 That's it? A list? Is this fantasy league baseball?

minitru

]]> 33:226516:c808372 Sat, 06 Jan 2007 00:00:28 EST <![CDATA[Jackin' Pop: We Got A Little Crazy With Our Calculators]]> http://idolator.com/tunes/jackin.-pop/jackin-pop-we-got-a-little-crazy-with-our-calculators-226516.php#c807553 I love this stuff. At my college magazine back in the day, we used to break ties on our year-end lists based on how many lists it appeared on, but in retropect we should've done the opposite - if it appeared on fewer lists it meant those voters really, really loved it. Ah, well.

Hey, Hold Steady-haters, bitch all you want, but B&GiA held up better than any other Top 10 dweller.

Chris Molanphy

]]> 33:226516:c807553 Fri, 05 Jan 2007 18:23:05 EST