<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Steve Jobs To Record Labels: Tear Down Your DRM Wall - Idolator Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 11:03:48 EST</lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 11:03:48 EST</pubDate>
		<link>http://idolator.com/tunes/drm/steve-jobs-to-record-labels-tear-down-your-drm-wall-234473.php</link>
		<description></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Steve Jobs To Record Labels: Tear Down Your DRM Wall]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/tunes/drm/steve-jobs-to-record-labels-tear-down-your-drm-wall-234473.php#c942594</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
You can't outlaw the stereo RCA jack.  At least yet.  Until that day, people will be copying music for free.</p> <p>mackro</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[mackro]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:234473:c942594</guid>
		    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 11:03:48 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Steve Jobs To Record Labels: Tear Down Your DRM Wall]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/tunes/drm/steve-jobs-to-record-labels-tear-down-your-drm-wall-234473.php#c942131</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
My guess on why DRM is on everything iTunes sells is technical -- it's much easier to administer a system, from an IT perspective, when you're applying one rule across the board vs. having some stuff DRM'd (major-label music) and other stuff not (indies selling at eMusic.) Less expensive and technically easier just to build DRM into AAC without exceptions.</p> <p>Reidicus</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reidicus]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:234473:c942131</guid>
		    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 09:42:31 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Steve Jobs To Record Labels: Tear Down Your DRM Wall]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/tunes/drm/steve-jobs-to-record-labels-tear-down-your-drm-wall-234473.php#c941587</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
"I am just curious. If he is anti-DRM and would love to see it removed from the ITMS, how come it is a requirement and not an option? Why isn't FairPlay a check box? I am sure all of the labels who support eMusic and do not have their music crippled by DRM would also love to see them free of "protection" on iTunes as well."</p>
<p>
My guess is that it's consistency. Things are easier for the user when you don't have to check to see if the music you're about to buy is FairPlay or not.</p>
<p>
An example of what can go wrong when you go the other way: A lot tracks in the Zune store have (or had) a no-sharing flag, so you couldn't even share them with the 3-plays-or-3-days deal. What's worse there was that there was no way to tell if you could share the song or not before buying it.</p>
<p>
I'm sure Apple would make it clear beforehand, but still. It's one extra hassle when you want buying from iTMS to be as much a no-thought-required process as possible.</p>
<p>
That's just a guess though.</p> <p><a href="http://sparkletone.net">sparkletone</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[sparkletone]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:234473:c941587</guid>
		    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 02:35:03 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Steve Jobs To Record Labels: Tear Down Your DRM Wall]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/tunes/drm/steve-jobs-to-record-labels-tear-down-your-drm-wall-234473.php#c941229</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
The LABELS require DRM. The only way Jobs could get their participation on the iTMS is to offer DRM. And of course Jobs doesn't care much about DRM: the iTMS doesn't make money for Apple. It's just there to support sales of iPods. </p>
<p>
And before you make the argument that iPods benefit from a closed system, don't. They play MP3s just fine. </p> <p>johndavidson</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[johndavidson]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:234473:c941229</guid>
		    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 23:09:57 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Steve Jobs To Record Labels: Tear Down Your DRM Wall]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/tunes/drm/steve-jobs-to-record-labels-tear-down-your-drm-wall-234473.php#c940315</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
This is in response to his bitch slapping by several European countries.</p>
<p>
I am just curious.  If he is anti-DRM and would love to see it removed from the ITMS, how come it is a requirement and not an option?  Why isn't FairPlay a check box?  I am sure all of the labels who support eMusic and do not have their music crippled by DRM would also love to see them free of "protection" on iTunes as well.</p>
<p>
I would love to hear someone with actual power, not an internet poster lugnut like me take him to task on this.  I have always felt DRM was benefiting Apple as well as it keeps people locked into the iPod music player, as much as it stops people from making illegal copies.  </p>
<p>
</p> <p><a href="http://www.gods-of-fire.com">noamjamski</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[noamjamski]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:234473:c940315</guid>
		    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 18:53:12 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Steve Jobs To Record Labels: Tear Down Your DRM Wall]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/tunes/drm/steve-jobs-to-record-labels-tear-down-your-drm-wall-234473.php#c940193</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
It's ON, baby!! This is tres hot.</p>
<p>
Over to you, Doug "the Thug." You've just been preemptively bitch-slapped.</p> <p><a href="http://chris.molanphy.com/pop">Chris Molanphy</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Molanphy]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:234473:c940193</guid>
		    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 18:32:50 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>