<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Project X: A-Sides Win Again - Idolator Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 21:16:48 EDT</lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 21:16:48 EDT</pubDate>
		<link>http://idolator.com/tunes/charts/project-x-a+sides-win-again-260535.php</link>
		<description></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Project X: A-Sides Win Again]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/tunes/charts/project-x-a+sides-win-again-260535.php#c1471152</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Well, it's good thing you guys can dismiss songs before you've even heard them, because I think that's a really <i>useful</i> talent.</p>
<p>
That being said, that Maroon 5 single is a huge fart on disco. "Girlfriend", on the other hand, I love more and more.</p> <p><a href="http://pageblank.blogspot.com">The Mozfather</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Mozfather]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:260535:c1471152</guid>
		    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 21:16:48 EDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Project X: A-Sides Win Again]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/tunes/charts/project-x-a+sides-win-again-260535.php#c1470335</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
@<a href="#c1470024">nonce</a>: Not at all, because I can probably do the same - and from having only heard one of the songs in question myself (and the original of another being one of my favourites).</p> <p>cerulgalactus</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[cerulgalactus]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:260535:c1470335</guid>
		    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 18:54:11 EDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Project X: A-Sides Win Again]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/tunes/charts/project-x-a+sides-win-again-260535.php#c1470024</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
If I've only heard one of these songs, and that's only because I found it on the internet, is that a good or bad thing?</p>
<p>
Is it worse that I can probably accurately describe all of the other nine songs without having heard them?</p> <p><a href="http://www.nicholasgrider.com">nonce</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[nonce]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:260535:c1470024</guid>
		    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 18:05:31 EDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Project X: A-Sides Win Again]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/tunes/charts/project-x-a+sides-win-again-260535.php#c1469681</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
@<a href="#c1468749">RepentTokyo</a>: Not sure that it would be all that different than the way things are now, and it might be better. Over 75,000 LPs came out last year (10,000 more than the year before), and over 55,000 of them sold less than a hundred copies. I would bet that 90% of those didn't even rise to the level of mediocrity. If that's not a sea, or at least a good sized lake, I hate to imagine what would be. Focusing on singles might cut out the deadwood (just to quickly shift metaphors) much faster, and result in a lot less waste.</p> <p><a href="http://www.theilliterate.com/topten/topten.html">The Illiterate</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Illiterate]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:260535:c1469681</guid>
		    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 17:15:02 EDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Project X: A-Sides Win Again]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/tunes/charts/project-x-a+sides-win-again-260535.php#c1469111</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
@<a href="#c1468314">The Illiterate</a>: Great point about Rihanna. Not to give him too much credit, but I wonder if this model will go down as Jay-Z's one great contribution as an executive - a return to the fast-turnover '60s model. (Then again, it could have been L.A. Reid's idea for all I know.)</p> <p><a href="http://chris.molanphy.com/pop">Chris Molanphy</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Molanphy]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:260535:c1469111</guid>
		    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 16:18:27 EDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Project X: A-Sides Win Again]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/tunes/charts/project-x-a+sides-win-again-260535.php#c1468749</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
if that becomes the model for the majors, be prepared to drown in a sea of mediocre tracks.</p> <p><a href="http://www.repenttokyo.com">RepentTokyo</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[RepentTokyo]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:260535:c1468749</guid>
		    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 15:46:24 EDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Project X: A-Sides Win Again]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/tunes/charts/project-x-a+sides-win-again-260535.php#c1468314</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
I think Michaelangelo is right in saying that the major labels will soon dominate the singles market, or will at least try, if they don't already. Fortunately, they're still hung up on physical product, which may give the indies more time. But if the indies are ever going to do anything on the singles chart, I think they need to go back to the old sixties model (as retro kind of people they should love that): a mixture of carefully conceived LPs, EPs and non-LP singles, with as little overlap as possible between releases. </p>
<p>
Also, pay close attention to Rihanna, who is returning to the old Motown tactic of no more than two singles per LP, and getting the records out quick (three albums in less than two years). If that becomes a model for the majors, and I think it will need to be, things are going to get even more harried on the charts. The test, I think, will be the next 50 Cent LP. If it tanks (and I suspect it will), the majors may finally be convinced that they need to keep their artists in the public eye as consistently as possible.</p>
<p>
@<a href="#c1465474">dennisobell</a>: I agree that Billboard should give a little more weight to radio, but I also think the main beneficiary will be country, and especially Underwood.</p> <p><a href="http://www.theilliterate.com/topten/topten.html">The Illiterate</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Illiterate]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:260535:c1468314</guid>
		    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 15:03:34 EDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Project X: A-Sides Win Again]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/tunes/charts/project-x-a+sides-win-again-260535.php#c1467202</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
I'm as pro-bubble gum as the next guy, but "Girlfriend" as single of the year?  She's not even having fun!  They dressed her up like she's still 17, pushed her out on stage and told her to smile for the tweeners.  </p>
<p>
Maybe I'm imagining it, but in that video she seems to be crawling out of her skin.  The whole thing is awkward and nakedly disingenuous.<br />
</p> <p><a href="http://kingricksolomon.blogspot.com">Bob Loblaw</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Loblaw]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:260535:c1467202</guid>
		    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 13:27:56 EDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Project X: A-Sides Win Again]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/tunes/charts/project-x-a+sides-win-again-260535.php#c1465584</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
I'm officially annoyed by Akon. Took a while, though. </p> <p>Chris N.</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris N.]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:260535:c1465584</guid>
		    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 10:45:25 EDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Project X: A-Sides Win Again]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/tunes/charts/project-x-a+sides-win-again-260535.php#c1465474</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Nice post, as always.</p>
<p>
You're 98% right about the dominance of singles sales, but airplay still plays a role: it keeps singles aloft after sales have peaked. That's why the Gwen/Akon single is still in the Top 10 and dropping slowly -- radio caught on to the song about 4-6 weeks after iTunes buyers did, and they still haven't played it out yet. (Well, to <i>me</i> it's played out. You too, probably. But by CHR standards they can probably burn it out for one more month.)</p>
<p>
The problem is, airplay is now <b>too</b> weak a factor in the Hot 100. What's making the charts so schizo (as both your post above and my post last week imply) is that sales now so dominates the charts that the tiniest movements on iTunes have outsize effects, and radio airplay can't tamp down the wild swings. That used to be radio's job on the Hot 100 -- and it's what makes the Billboard chart unique, compared with, say, the British charts, which are all sales. But no matter how Billboard jiggers its Hot 100 formula, there's no way for them to put a lid on outsize track sales, whereas radio play has natural limits. Hence, the Carrie Underwood phenomenon.</p>
<p>
Conversely, in the late '90s-early '00s, when there was no iTunes and singles had been virtually eliminated, the Hot 100 became a de facto airplay chart and became crashingly dull: singles sitting at #1 for months, only superstar acts breaking through, etc. Basically, the chart feels wonky if either factor, sales or airplay, is dominant.</p> <p><a href="http://chris.molanphy.com/pop">Chris Molanphy</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Molanphy]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:260535:c1465474</guid>
		    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 10:29:33 EDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Project X: A-Sides Win Again]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/tunes/charts/project-x-a+sides-win-again-260535.php#c1465222</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
you know what's great?  i haven't heard a single one of these tracks on my xm radio, because if I don't want to, I don't have to.</p> <p><a href="http://www.repenttokyo.com">RepentTokyo</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[RepentTokyo]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:260535:c1465222</guid>
		    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 09:52:25 EDT</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Project X: A-Sides Win Again]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/tunes/charts/project-x-a+sides-win-again-260535.php#c1465177</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Yeah, the enuciation in "Girlfriend" caught my attention, too.  Particularly the line "I want to be your girlfriend." 99 out of 100 pop songs would have gone with "wanna".</p> <p>Audif Jackson Winters III</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Audif Jackson Winters III]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:260535:c1465177</guid>
		    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 09:44:53 EDT</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>