<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[ - Idolator Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:09:24 EDT</lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:09:24 EDT</pubDate>
		<link>http://idolator.com/tunes/money%2C-money%2C-money/-292150.php</link>
		<description></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/tunes/money%2C-money%2C-money/-292150.php#c2195777</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Coolfer has it wrong... or the Telegraph article changed since Coolfer quoted from it.</p>
<p>
The article currently says "75% of those who clicked on the overlay watched the entire advert." That's not a click-through rate; that's a completion rate. The number of viewers who actually click on the ad overlay could be quite small.</p> <p><a href="http://boysbriefs.blogspot.com/">chrisb</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[chrisb]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:292150:c2195777</guid>
		    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:09:24 EDT</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>