<![CDATA[R. Kelly: Too Pervy For Hollywood? - Idolator Comments]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/idolator.com.png <![CDATA[R. Kelly: Too Pervy For Hollywood? - Idolator Comments]]> http://idolator.com Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:03:38 EST Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:03:38 EST http://idolator.com/tunes/a-woman.s-threat/r-kelly-too-pervy-for-hollywood-332850.php <![CDATA[R. Kelly: Too Pervy For Hollywood?]]> http://idolator.com/tunes/a-woman.s-threat/r-kelly-too-pervy-for-hollywood-332850.php#c3297078 @rad_matter: Forgot to mention, that earlier protest was successful.

rad_matter

]]> 33:332850:c3297078 Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:03:38 EST <![CDATA[R. Kelly: Too Pervy For Hollywood?]]> http://idolator.com/tunes/a-woman.s-threat/r-kelly-too-pervy-for-hollywood-332850.php#c3297058 I wouldn't be surprised if Cannick's protest succeeds--she and other activists boycotted a drag queen who dressed up in blackface and pretended to be a "Black woman." Maybe Ne-Yo can perform at the Kells concert instead?

rad_matter

]]> 33:332850:c3297058 Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:02:53 EST <![CDATA[R. Kelly: Too Pervy For Hollywood?]]> http://idolator.com/tunes/a-woman.s-threat/r-kelly-too-pervy-for-hollywood-332850.php#c3294844 @NeverEnough: He's already proven himself willing, in chapter 14, to completely retcon large portions of the first twelve chapters, so frankly I'm not concerned about that outcome.

lastclearchance

]]> 33:332850:c3294844 Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:27:17 EST <![CDATA[R. Kelly: Too Pervy For Hollywood?]]> http://idolator.com/tunes/a-woman.s-threat/r-kelly-too-pervy-for-hollywood-332850.php#c3293625 His left eye is following me...

rhythmchyc

]]> 33:332850:c3293625 Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:34:30 EST <![CDATA[R. Kelly: Too Pervy For Hollywood?]]> http://idolator.com/tunes/a-woman.s-threat/r-kelly-too-pervy-for-hollywood-332850.php#c3293201 Wow 14 counts? That's pretty bad...if he's convicted he's gonna be put away for a good long while.

beta.rogan

]]> 33:332850:c3293201 Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:17:55 EST <![CDATA[R. Kelly: Too Pervy For Hollywood?]]> http://idolator.com/tunes/a-woman.s-threat/r-kelly-too-pervy-for-hollywood-332850.php#c3293174 @Ned Raggett: That would be a far better ending than having every single character die of AIDS.

NeverEnough

]]> 33:332850:c3293174 Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:16:54 EST <![CDATA[R. Kelly: Too Pervy For Hollywood?]]> http://idolator.com/tunes/a-woman.s-threat/r-kelly-too-pervy-for-hollywood-332850.php#c3293112 @encyclopediablack: Polanski's not American, so it's simply the fact that we stupid Americans don't understand his culture.

Yup, we who don't live in LA are just a bunch of dumb bigots. America? Pfftt!

Dead Air ummm Dead Air

]]> 33:332850:c3293112 Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:14:14 EST <![CDATA[R. Kelly: Too Pervy For Hollywood?]]> http://idolator.com/tunes/a-woman.s-threat/r-kelly-too-pervy-for-hollywood-332850.php#c3293087 @NeverEnough: Any guesses as to what 'The Package' is?

Personal bias, but I hope it's this one.

Ned Raggett

]]> 33:332850:c3293087 Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:12:49 EST <![CDATA[R. Kelly: Too Pervy For Hollywood?]]> http://idolator.com/tunes/a-woman.s-threat/r-kelly-too-pervy-for-hollywood-332850.php#c3292907 Hollywood logic....

Roman Polanski: Yay!

R. Kelly: Boo!

encyclopediablack

]]> 33:332850:c3292907 Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:03:11 EST <![CDATA[R. Kelly: Too Pervy For Hollywood?]]> http://idolator.com/tunes/a-woman.s-threat/r-kelly-too-pervy-for-hollywood-332850.php#c3292561 There's a pretty significant difference in "weird/crass/perverted" and, uh, child molestation.

extracrispy

]]> 33:332850:c3292561 Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:47:49 EST <![CDATA[R. Kelly: Too Pervy For Hollywood?]]> http://idolator.com/tunes/a-woman.s-threat/r-kelly-too-pervy-for-hollywood-332850.php#c3292368 Have we analyzed "Trapped in the Closet: Chapter 13-22" yet? Any guesses as to what 'The Package' is?

NeverEnough

]]> 33:332850:c3292368 Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:38:41 EST