<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[ - Idolator Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 17:01:38 EST</lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 17:01:38 EST</pubDate>
		<link>http://idolator.com/339469/</link>
		<description></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/339469/#c3519922</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I can narrow this down for the poor guy: the failed copy-protection for analog sources dates to the late 1980s -- I know, because I remember reading about it in either <i>High Fidelity</i> or <i>Stereo Review</i> at my high school library (had to be there; I've never subscribed to either mag), and that would place this whole adventure between 1985 and 1989.</p>
<p>The reason I remember those two mags covering this short-lived controversy is that the audiophile community (one I pay attention to only glancingly) was <i>furious</i> about this idea, not because they liked taping music so much as they despised the idea of any audio degradation, even theoretical.</p>
<p>IIRC -- and this might be apocryphal  -- the <i>dénouement</i> of the whole thing happened when a hardcore audio scientist/nerd at one of the publications produced a <b>gotcha!</b> moment: a record where the addition of the high-pitched signal eliminated the entirety of, like, a woodwind in an orchestra or some-such. The lab working at the RIAA's behest conceded the point, and the effort was dropped.</p> <p><a href="http://chris.molanphy.com/pop">Chris Molanphy</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Molanphy]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:339469:c3519922</guid>
		    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 17:01:38 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>