<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[EMI Plans To Maximize The Potential Of Artists, Minimize Its Roster Of Employees - Idolator Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:05:06 EST</lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:05:06 EST</pubDate>
		<link>http://idolator.com/344919/emi-plans-to-maximize-the-potential-of-artists-minimize-its-roster-of-employees</link>
		<description></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[EMI Plans To Maximize The Potential Of Artists, Minimize Its Roster Of Employees]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/344919/emi-plans-to-maximize-the-potential-of-artists-minimize-its-roster-of-employees#c3714538</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>This kind of restructuring works great (well, okay, it works -- let's just leave it at that) when you're making widgets in multiple international markets -- but I'm curious to see if it will work to boost sales of an intangible service (because face it, music is basically intangible service now).</p>
<p>Back office consolidation is generally always a good thing, but does have a tendency to lead to even more bureaucratic red tape and overworked staffers. Still, this part actually might work to save a little bit of money here and there, but it's not going to save the business.</p>
<p>I wonder about the wisdom of pushing to develop more new artists, though. I guess the three months of due diligence made it clear that established cash-cow artists aren't so cash-cowy anymore -- plus they're spoiled by the old business model (Robbie Williams) and won't roll with the new punches. A crop of new artists will be less of a drain. Or something. At any rate, clearly we're returning to the spit 'em up and chew 'em out singles-not-albums strategy? OMG, it's 1960!</p> <p><a href="http://therichgirlsareweeping.blogspot.com">the rich girls are weeping</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[the rich girls are weeping]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:344919:c3714538</guid>
		    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:05:06 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>