<![CDATA[The Possible Presidential Aspirations Of "Rolling Stone" - Idolator Comments]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/idolator.com.png <![CDATA[The Possible Presidential Aspirations Of "Rolling Stone" - Idolator Comments]]> http://idolator.com Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:56:17 EST Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:56:17 EST http://idolator.com/350616/the-possible-presidential-aspirations-of-rolling-stone <![CDATA[The Possible Presidential Aspirations Of "Rolling Stone"]]> http://idolator.com/350616/the-possible-presidential-aspirations-of-rolling-stone#c3969042 @Matos: Thanks. I did google it, but got mostly links to shit about Terminator, which, come on, even then most right thinking folks knew was a stupid pen name and probably entirely fictional.

Feh Am Legend

]]> 33:350616:c3969042 Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:56:17 EST <![CDATA[The Possible Presidential Aspirations Of "Rolling Stone"]]> http://idolator.com/350616/the-possible-presidential-aspirations-of-rolling-stone#c3967113 Needs more music.

heyzeus

]]> 33:350616:c3967113 Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:05:47 EST <![CDATA[The Possible Presidential Aspirations Of "Rolling Stone"]]> http://idolator.com/350616/the-possible-presidential-aspirations-of-rolling-stone#c3967004 Doughty long ago given himself away as Dirty Sanchez. (I enjoyed that column too.)

Michaelangelo Matos

]]> 33:350616:c3967004 Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:00:26 EST <![CDATA[The Possible Presidential Aspirations Of "Rolling Stone"]]> http://idolator.com/350616/the-possible-presidential-aspirations-of-rolling-stone#c3966686 Sorry, I still think Matt Taibbi is annoying as fuck. Way too impressed with himself to be the next Hunter Thompson.

Razzler

]]> 33:350616:c3966686 Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:46:30 EST <![CDATA[The Possible Presidential Aspirations Of "Rolling Stone"]]> http://idolator.com/350616/the-possible-presidential-aspirations-of-rolling-stone#c3966643 Well reviewed, anono-sir. I look forward to reading this.

On a completely side note: I think the argument could be made for the NYP releasing the term "dirty sanchez" into the popular vernacular. Back in, what, the late 80s?, it was the nom de plume of a "music critic" for the Press whose defining critical approach was to rip on everything. Funny stuff; apparently not online. Rumored to be a fairly high-profile odd-ball alt.rock-er (okay, Mike Doughty) but I had no inside info. Anyway. I or no one I knew had heard the term dirty sanchez; many readers of the paper assumed it was just a racist joke.

Now it's at least one punchline in every "edgy" comedy that comes down the pike. But I'm guessing they were one of the first.

Feh Am Legend

]]> 33:350616:c3966643 Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:44:10 EST <![CDATA[The Possible Presidential Aspirations Of "Rolling Stone"]]> http://idolator.com/350616/the-possible-presidential-aspirations-of-rolling-stone#c3964308 oxford, not cambridge.

izunes

]]> 33:350616:c3964308 Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:12:43 EST <![CDATA[The Possible Presidential Aspirations Of "Rolling Stone"]]> http://idolator.com/350616/the-possible-presidential-aspirations-of-rolling-stone#c3963458 Great piece and ends on a perfect question. You do have to wonder how long certain charades get played out.

Ned Raggett

]]> 33:350616:c3963458 Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:43:12 EST