<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA["USA Today" Shows Us How To Write A Grammy Story Without Using The Words "Amy" And "Winehouse" - Idolator Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:51:57 EST</lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:51:57 EST</pubDate>
		<link>http://idolator.com/354165/usa-today-shows-us-how-to-write-a-grammy-story-without-using-the-words-amy-and-winehouse</link>
		<description></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA["USA Today" Shows Us How To Write A Grammy Story Without Using The Words "Amy" And "Winehouse"]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/354165/usa-today-shows-us-how-to-write-a-grammy-story-without-using-the-words-amy-and-winehouse#c4126327</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4121005">DHMBIB</a>: I'm with you on most of these predix. I loves me some Kanye, but it's Amy FTW. Let's come back Monday and see if we're right.</p> <p>Chris Molanphy</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Molanphy]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:354165:c4126327</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:51:57 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA["USA Today" Shows Us How To Write A Grammy Story Without Using The Words "Amy" And "Winehouse"]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/354165/usa-today-shows-us-how-to-write-a-grammy-story-without-using-the-words-amy-and-winehouse#c4121005</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4119387">Chris Molanphy</a>: Amen, brother. Except -- of course -- I've got Amy taking this one.</p>
<p>I was also a bit taken aback by the near unanimity of the critics. Especially in light of the fact that 4 out of 5 gave <i>Graduation</i> their "should win" votes as well as their "will win" votes. (For those who haven't seen the graphic, one critic gave Herbie Hancock her "should win" vote.)</p>
<p>Also, did you catch how out-of-touch these critics are with USAT's readers? The readers' poll went: 1) Vince Gill (!); 2) Foo Fighters; 3) Amy Winehouse; 4) Kanye West; and 5) Herbie Hancock. I guess the America's-interstate-rest-stop-diner-patrons vote overwhelmed the America's-business-travelers vote in this poll.</p>
<p>I'll flesh this out on my own blog on Saturday, but I've been contrarian on the whole "Amy's such a mess Grammy doesn't want to 'enable' her thing". I think she's gonna sweep. My two basic supporting points:</p>
<p>1) Her nominations are almost completely interlocking. With the possible exception of ROTY and SOTY, how can she not be considered the overwhelming favorite in each category? And every voter who thinks <i>Back To Black</i> is the AOTY has to give her BNA, and one or two more, at least.</p>
<p>2) Grammy has been falling all over itself to make sure Amy's involved on Sunday nite. They plan to have her perform in a studio in London and "accept her awards via satellite". Ahem.</p>
<p>Someone behind the scenes obviously knows what the results are, but I think Grammy smells history on Sunday nite. And heaven knows the music industry could use some big positive press right about now.</p>
<p>Here's your leading indicator -- "Producer Of The Year, Non-Classical". If this award, which will go out in the early ceremony (methinks?), goes to Mark Ronson, it's gonna be a big nite for Amy Winehouse.</p> <p><a href="http://donthatemebecauseimbloggerful.blogspot.com">Rob Murphy</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Murphy]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:354165:c4121005</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:20:09 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA["USA Today" Shows Us How To Write A Grammy Story Without Using The Words "Amy" And "Winehouse"]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/354165/usa-today-shows-us-how-to-write-a-grammy-story-without-using-the-words-amy-and-winehouse#c4119387</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Reading the USA Today package, the thing I keep coming back to is that infographic with all the critics' predictions. Here's what's shocking me: <b>How is Kanye's album such a prohibitive favorite?</b></p>
<p>Yeah, yeah, I know the core theory: "It sold a lot, and Grammy likes big sellers," but in the album category, that's kind of bullshit -- they like big sellers <i>that make them comfortable</i>, of the Celine Dion-Sheryl Crow-Natalie Cole-Ray Charles variety. Hip-hop albums generally don't rally the voters. Even Lauryn Hill's and OutKast's wins over the last decade are explainable by their catchy, mostly-sung-and-not-rapped big hits.</p>
<p>I'll throw this open to the Idolator peanut gallery: <b>Is Kanye a shoo-in?</b> Make no mistake, I'd be happy for him (even over Winehouse; I ranked <i>Graduation</i> over <i>Back to Black</i> on my Idolator poll). But I just don't see how the Recording Academy won't find a way to screw him over again.</p> <p>Chris Molanphy</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Molanphy]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:354165:c4119387</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:22:09 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA["USA Today" Shows Us How To Write A Grammy Story Without Using The Words "Amy" And "Winehouse"]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/354165/usa-today-shows-us-how-to-write-a-grammy-story-without-using-the-words-amy-and-winehouse#c4114876</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>Why is it that guys are expected to waltz through the drug thing like Keith Richards, despite plenty of counterexamples, but every woman in rehab is Janis Joplin waiting to happen? I'm just sayin.</P> <p>Diglett</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diglett]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:354165:c4114876</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:43:23 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA["USA Today" Shows Us How To Write A Grammy Story Without Using The Words "Amy" And "Winehouse"]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/354165/usa-today-shows-us-how-to-write-a-grammy-story-without-using-the-words-amy-and-winehouse#c4114628</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4113128">loudersoft</a>: @<a href="#c4114318">Marth</a>: I'd pay $.99 to hear Amy cover "Sailing", if that helps.</p> <p><a href="http://donthatemebecauseimbloggerful.blogspot.com">Rob Murphy</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Murphy]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:354165:c4114628</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:32:38 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA["USA Today" Shows Us How To Write A Grammy Story Without Using The Words "Amy" And "Winehouse"]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/354165/usa-today-shows-us-how-to-write-a-grammy-story-without-using-the-words-amy-and-winehouse#c4114318</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4113128">loudersoft</a>: I will personally finance that recording session if that's what it takes to make it a reality.</p> <p>Marth</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marth]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:354165:c4114318</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:17:59 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA["USA Today" Shows Us How To Write A Grammy Story Without Using The Words "Amy" And "Winehouse"]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/354165/usa-today-shows-us-how-to-write-a-grammy-story-without-using-the-words-amy-and-winehouse#c4114304</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4113962">femstix</a>: in the amy winehouse vs. feist fite, it's amy in a ballet-slippered walk.</p> <p><a href="http://idolator.com/">Maura Johnston</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maura Johnston]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:354165:c4114304</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:17:41 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA["USA Today" Shows Us How To Write A Grammy Story Without Using The Words "Amy" And "Winehouse"]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/354165/usa-today-shows-us-how-to-write-a-grammy-story-without-using-the-words-amy-and-winehouse#c4114100</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Christopher Cross may be boring, but he's made it past 50. Breathing has to count for something.</p> <p>Chris N.</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris N.]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:354165:c4114100</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:07:51 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA["USA Today" Shows Us How To Write A Grammy Story Without Using The Words "Amy" And "Winehouse"]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/354165/usa-today-shows-us-how-to-write-a-grammy-story-without-using-the-words-amy-and-winehouse#c4114064</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4113962">femstix</a>: (trying...hard...not...to...over-react...)</p>
<p>After I saw this piece online this morning, I queued up the tracks released as part of the "deluxe" re-release of <i>Back To Black</i> recently. If you haven't heard those, I would suggest you check out Amy's version of "Cupid". Sam Cooke would've been very proud.</p> <p><a href="http://donthatemebecauseimbloggerful.blogspot.com">Rob Murphy</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Murphy]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:354165:c4114064</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:05:55 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA["USA Today" Shows Us How To Write A Grammy Story Without Using The Words "Amy" And "Winehouse"]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/354165/usa-today-shows-us-how-to-write-a-grammy-story-without-using-the-words-amy-and-winehouse#c4113962</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>Wait, since when isn't Amy Winehouse (very well produced) disposable pop? Or is the blogosphere backlash over already?</P> <p>stix</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[stix]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:354165:c4113962</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:01:21 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA["USA Today" Shows Us How To Write A Grammy Story Without Using The Words "Amy" And "Winehouse"]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/354165/usa-today-shows-us-how-to-write-a-grammy-story-without-using-the-words-amy-and-winehouse#c4113569</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>It's a shame Koko wasn't there when Cross cleaned up back in '80</P> <p>BigRicks</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[BigRicks]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:354165:c4113569</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 10:42:38 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA["USA Today" Shows Us How To Write A Grammy Story Without Using The Words "Amy" And "Winehouse"]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/354165/usa-today-shows-us-how-to-write-a-grammy-story-without-using-the-words-amy-and-winehouse#c4113128</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Amy Winehouse and Christopher Cross can do a record together for their next trick.</p> <p><a href="http://loudersoft.com">loudersoft</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[loudersoft]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:354165:c4113128</guid>
		    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 10:23:35 EST</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>