<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Yay, Journalism! - Idolator Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:36:58 EDT</lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:36:58 EDT</pubDate>
		<link>http://idolator.com/374590/yay-journalism</link>
		<description></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Yay, Journalism!]]></title>
		    <link>http://idolator.com/374590/yay-journalism#c4968685</link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Is it bad that I feel like it was a greater breach of journalism ethics that the interview was incredibly uninteresting? Besides, how close can they be if he's emailing the questions? Does the guy from Javelin really not want to grant a phoner to the guy who has the power to write the most biased piece on the group ever? So why not?</p> <p>cfitzrandolph</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[cfitzrandolph]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false">33:374590:c4968685</guid>
		    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:36:58 EDT</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>