<![CDATA[ - Idolator Comments]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/idolator.com.png <![CDATA[ - Idolator Comments]]> http://idolator.com Wed, 09 Apr 2008 14:03:44 EDT Wed, 09 Apr 2008 14:03:44 EDT http://idolator.com/377808/ <![CDATA[]]> http://idolator.com/377808/#c5105604 I actually think there's more demand for classical coverage than publishers think. I also think publishers will be in trouble when they find in 10 years that kids (ie pop fans) don't read papers or go to their crappy websites for music news/content. But even then, they prolly still won't realize that maybe, just maybe, they should have kept some of their smarter content, because the only ones who read papers anymore are those over 40.

MC

]]> 33:377808:c5105604 Wed, 09 Apr 2008 14:03:44 EDT <![CDATA[]]> http://idolator.com/377808/#c5104947 @Chris N.: You're a music writer, right? I think if you extend that question to music coverage on the whole you'll fall down a very slippery slope.

Maura Johnston

]]> 33:377808:c5104947 Wed, 09 Apr 2008 13:43:08 EDT <![CDATA[]]> http://idolator.com/377808/#c5104900 Now he can make more as a composer. Best of luck, Alan.

okiedoke

]]> 33:377808:c5104900 Wed, 09 Apr 2008 13:41:47 EDT <![CDATA[]]> http://idolator.com/377808/#c5103810 Not to be cruel, but is there much demand for classical music coverage?

Chris N.

]]> 33:377808:c5103810 Wed, 09 Apr 2008 13:06:04 EDT