<![CDATA[Shirley Manson's Label Apparently Unfamiliar With Garbage Catalog - Idolator Comments]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/idolator.com.png <![CDATA[Shirley Manson's Label Apparently Unfamiliar With Garbage Catalog - Idolator Comments]]> http://idolator.com Tue, 15 Apr 2008 05:30:43 EDT Tue, 15 Apr 2008 05:30:43 EDT http://idolator.com/379578/shirley-mansons-label-apparently-unfamiliar-with-garbage-catalog <![CDATA[Shirley Manson's Label Apparently Unfamiliar With Garbage Catalog]]> http://idolator.com/379578/shirley-mansons-label-apparently-unfamiliar-with-garbage-catalog#c5193895 If she went the same route as Radiohead, I'd definitely buy her solo album as a digital download.

We need more notable singers and bands (the names who were popular a few years ago but for some reason aren't being pushed by the labels today) to sell their new stuff online.

thewriteguy

]]> 33:379578:c5193895 Tue, 15 Apr 2008 05:30:43 EDT <![CDATA[Shirley Manson's Label Apparently Unfamiliar With Garbage Catalog]]> http://idolator.com/379578/shirley-mansons-label-apparently-unfamiliar-with-garbage-catalog#c5189508 @Audif Jackson Winters III: Yeah, kind of, huh?

Audif Jackson Winters III

]]> 33:379578:c5189508 Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:23:33 EDT <![CDATA[Shirley Manson's Label Apparently Unfamiliar With Garbage Catalog]]> http://idolator.com/379578/shirley-mansons-label-apparently-unfamiliar-with-garbage-catalog#c5189502 I was always kind of surprised that "Version 2.0" was kind of a stiff in the U.S.

Audif Jackson Winters III

]]> 33:379578:c5189502 Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:23:07 EDT <![CDATA[Shirley Manson's Label Apparently Unfamiliar With Garbage Catalog]]> http://idolator.com/379578/shirley-mansons-label-apparently-unfamiliar-with-garbage-catalog#c5188902 @Tenno: Same here - I've had a crush on her since the first time I heard "Queer".

And her voice still reduces me to "babbling schoolgirl".

scarletvirtue - Fake American Feminist

]]> 33:379578:c5188902 Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:40:11 EDT <![CDATA[Shirley Manson's Label Apparently Unfamiliar With Garbage Catalog]]> http://idolator.com/379578/shirley-mansons-label-apparently-unfamiliar-with-garbage-catalog#c5188379 I love how salty she always is.

narymary

]]> 33:379578:c5188379 Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:07:51 EDT <![CDATA[Shirley Manson's Label Apparently Unfamiliar With Garbage Catalog]]> http://idolator.com/379578/shirley-mansons-label-apparently-unfamiliar-with-garbage-catalog#c5187534 ^_^ I had such a crush on her... in fact I still do.

Tenno

]]> 33:379578:c5187534 Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:16:42 EDT <![CDATA[Shirley Manson's Label Apparently Unfamiliar With Garbage Catalog]]> http://idolator.com/379578/shirley-mansons-label-apparently-unfamiliar-with-garbage-catalog#c5187464 @HONEYBFLY: Add Debbie Harry, Siouxie and Karen O to that amazingly short list.

That being said, Shirley has a storied history with getting screwed by her label contracts. (Radioactive, Warner, etc.)

pdn

]]> 33:379578:c5187464 Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:12:24 EDT <![CDATA[Shirley Manson's Label Apparently Unfamiliar With Garbage Catalog]]> http://idolator.com/379578/shirley-mansons-label-apparently-unfamiliar-with-garbage-catalog#c5187406 One wonders why she's even dealing with a label, beyond being locked into a contract with one. If all you want to do is get your stuff out there, there's no need to deal with the middleman anymore. And given that Shirley already has a built-in audience, all the more reason.

Reidicus

]]> 33:379578:c5187406 Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:08:18 EDT <![CDATA[Shirley Manson's Label Apparently Unfamiliar With Garbage Catalog]]> http://idolator.com/379578/shirley-mansons-label-apparently-unfamiliar-with-garbage-catalog#c5187073 Garbage That is all.

Captain Wrong

]]> 33:379578:c5187073 Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:50:05 EDT <![CDATA[Shirley Manson's Label Apparently Unfamiliar With Garbage Catalog]]> http://idolator.com/379578/shirley-mansons-label-apparently-unfamiliar-with-garbage-catalog#c5186752 this bums me out

thumper

]]> 33:379578:c5186752 Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:32:38 EDT <![CDATA[Shirley Manson's Label Apparently Unfamiliar With Garbage Catalog]]> http://idolator.com/379578/shirley-mansons-label-apparently-unfamiliar-with-garbage-catalog#c5186547 God, how I love her.

FionaScrapple

]]> 33:379578:c5186547 Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:24:15 EDT <![CDATA[Shirley Manson's Label Apparently Unfamiliar With Garbage Catalog]]> http://idolator.com/379578/shirley-mansons-label-apparently-unfamiliar-with-garbage-catalog#c5186466 She's 41? God I'm getting old.

zaky

]]> 33:379578:c5186466 Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:21:15 EDT <![CDATA[Shirley Manson's Label Apparently Unfamiliar With Garbage Catalog]]> http://idolator.com/379578/shirley-mansons-label-apparently-unfamiliar-with-garbage-catalog#c5185779 Shirls is a shit-talker of the finest form! I can think of very few women she's not verbally crucified in the music business (Besides Hynde and Stefani, is there anybody she actually likes?)

And I agree with the Madonna comment, the Timberlake connection reeks of desperation...

HONEYBFLY

]]> 33:379578:c5185779 Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:56:13 EDT <![CDATA[Shirley Manson's Label Apparently Unfamiliar With Garbage Catalog]]> http://idolator.com/379578/shirley-mansons-label-apparently-unfamiliar-with-garbage-catalog#c5185308 wicked ways. best garbage song ever.

AustinSoundcheck

]]> 33:379578:c5185308 Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:40:02 EDT <![CDATA[Shirley Manson's Label Apparently Unfamiliar With Garbage Catalog]]> http://idolator.com/379578/shirley-mansons-label-apparently-unfamiliar-with-garbage-catalog#c5183605 "I mean, really. Does every 40something woman have to collaborate with Timbaland or Mims in order to get an album on shelves?"

Does this mean that the rumors of a Timbaland-produced Feist album are true?

loudersoft

]]> 33:379578:c5183605 Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:43:54 EDT