<![CDATA[ - Idolator Comments]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/idolator.com.png <![CDATA[ - Idolator Comments]]> http://idolator.com Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:55:58 EDT Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:55:58 EDT http://idolator.com/399018/ <![CDATA[]]> http://idolator.com/399018/#c6832293 The big question is - does the album stand up?

cheesebubble

]]> 33:399018:c6832293 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:55:58 EDT <![CDATA[]]> http://idolator.com/399018/#c6825039 Interested to see actual Soundscan numbers -- and next week's numbers, too.

owenmeany

]]> 33:399018:c6825039 Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:57:10 EDT <![CDATA[]]> http://idolator.com/399018/#c6822023 WORD! on the Amazon data. I think, because of the length, Billboard/SoundScan have to track it as an album, no matter how many tracks it has. (Cf. Jethro Tull's single-track Thick as a Brick going to No. 1 on the album chart in the early '70s.)

Chris Molanphy

]]> 33:399018:c6822023 Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:12:18 EDT <![CDATA[]]> http://idolator.com/399018/#c6817103 Only 43:55? What an overpriced ripoff!

Chris N.

]]> 33:399018:c6817103 Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:43:33 EDT